The election of Obama and the market crash were engineere, planned.
The 500 billion dollar in two hour drop in the money markets was an attack on our coutnry, an act of war.
[Recall Pres Bush mentioning a financial attack on the U.S. in one of his last speeches? Well, nothing came of it because the Dems were the ones who did it.]
Geithner has been doing the bidding of someone else for awhile.
Apparently since 2007 at least by this proof.
Why isn’t he under indictment? It’s a rhetorical question, I get that, but it makes me want to ask this questions: Have you not been paying attention?
Laws don’t apply to the banks.
As long as the banks keep cashing gummint checks, they can do whatever they dam well please.
If the SHTF, these guys needs to be “held accountable”
Laws don’t apply to Democrats.
Special Rules for Special People.
It don't matter. If you haven't learned the lesson from David Gregory's illegal magazine, Bill clinton's perjury or Hillary Clinton's billing records and Scooter Libby's memory failure that "progresives" have a special set of laws and conservatives are persecuted and prosecuted, then you ain't EVER going to learn the lesson of modern politics.
Prosecutorial discretion is only for liberals.
Hasn’t he heard? Laws don’t apply to liberal elites.
Well two thoughts. First, tax cheat Timmy will be the next case heard after Corzine’s. Second, he had to lie because the whole thing was Bush’s fault. If the first item will never happen, you can make bank that the second will be stated by some idiot.