Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Responds to All of Those Secession Petitions: There’s No Right to Secede
The Blaze ^ | 1-12-13 | Madeleine Morgenstern

Posted on 01/12/2013 10:07:52 AM PST by Mozilla

The Obama administration on Friday responded to the wave of secession petitions that spread online following the November election, preaching unity over division and saying there’s no right to secede.

“In a nation of 300 million people — each with their own set of deeply-held beliefs — democracy can be noisy and controversial. And that’s a good thing. Free and open debate is what makes this country work, and many people around the world risk their lives every day for the liberties we often take for granted,” wrote Jon Carson, director of the Office of Public Engagement.

“But as much as we value a healthy debate, we don’t let that debate tear us apart,” he said.

More than two dozen states from all corners of the country filed online White House petitions after President Barack Obama’s victory over Gov. Mitt Romney, calling for the government to allow them to secede. Carson’s letter was filed in response to requests from Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, all of which garnered the necessary 25,000 signatures.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: petitions; secession; staterights; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: IronJack

So you don’t pay taxes. You get various letters from the IRS, and invited to pay. You have to respond, or you waive your right to court. Then they start the collection process. They are really good at it. Banks, businesses have a lot more to gain by following federal law than from supporting you.

So you go to court, and explain to the tax court judge that you have seceded. Good luck. See you in a few years.


61 posted on 01/12/2013 10:18:42 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

No gun control regulation is likely to pass the House. The rest is fantasy.


62 posted on 01/12/2013 10:20:30 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
So you don’t pay taxes. You get various letters from the IRS, and invited to pay. You have to respond, or you waive your right to court. Then they start the collection process. They are really good at it. Banks, businesses have a lot more to gain by following federal law than from supporting you. So you go to court, and explain to the tax court judge that you have seceded. Good luck. See you in a few years.

Two words....two words in the English language...."I forgot".

63 posted on 01/12/2013 10:24:45 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The constitution discusses how a state may join the union. It does not utter a word about how a state may leave. This clearly means it is a power not enumerated to the Federal government.

Well, no. The supremacy clause says:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

So a state can't simply declare that it's not part of the union and federal laws don't apply to it. Moreover, there is a process by which states are admitted to the union. That a state or something claiming to represent a state could simply break all ties with the United States without the Congress having some say in the matter is unlikely.

64 posted on 01/13/2013 10:44:42 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
You have to respond, or you waive your right to court.

Their courts have no jurisdiction over me. I am a sovereign citizen of another state.

Then they start the collection process.

What does that mean? The "collection process" requires cooperation from someone. And if they refuse to cooperate?

Banks, businesses have a lot more to gain by following federal law than from supporting you.

Those same banks and businesses will also be exempt from federal taxes, not to mention the onus of acting as tax collector for the feds. I hardly see how it benefits them to stand with the feds against the people who make their banks and businesses work.

There are all kinds of defeatist reasons why secession is an impossibility. The same was said of the ne'er-do-wells who fought for independence from the Crown. Thank God they didn't listen.

So you go to court, and explain to the tax court judge that you have seceded. Good luck. See you in a few years.

I don't go to court. Or if I do, I'm joined by a few hundred thousands of others. And then let the judge explain to US why he's defending tyranny.

And if I see you in a few years, it will probably be from the opposite side of a barricade.

65 posted on 01/13/2013 10:44:57 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"So you go to court, and explain to the tax court judge that you have seceded. Good luck. See you in a few years."

I don't go to court. Or if I do, I'm joined by a few hundred thousands of others. And then let the judge explain to US why he's defending tyranny.

And if I see you in a few years, it will probably be from the opposite side of a barricade.

Great rebuttal to the defeatist doom and gloomers, Jack. That's the spirit of '76.

66 posted on 01/13/2013 4:33:35 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
There are all kinds of defeatist reasons why secession is an impossibility.

I like the one about the states can't secede because of the power grid. Have you heard that one yet? LOL

67 posted on 01/13/2013 4:36:30 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Windflier; IronJack

Yea...right on...that’ll show ‘em. Let us know when visiting day is.


68 posted on 01/13/2013 7:28:26 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I understand that Denzel Washington just got out, so there is probably room for you now.


69 posted on 01/13/2013 9:49:21 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I don’t think they will be able to contact us, unless once incarcerated they sell out enough that the warden lets them have internet access.


70 posted on 01/13/2013 9:54:11 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: x
For a lot of secessionists the emotional act of slamming the door on the way out is more important and satisfying than the actual change in political status. Such emotionalism is where separationist movements often go wrong.

I'll bet you'd be hard pressed to find a successful separationist movement that wasn't full of emotional intensity.

71 posted on 01/13/2013 10:39:42 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I would imagine visiting day is whenever your master lets you out. As for me, it’s whenever I choose to entertain visitors. After all, I am a free man.


72 posted on 01/14/2013 5:14:17 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

I’m not sure what Denzel Washington just got out of, but I doubt it would be anyplace I’d care to frequent.

Thanks for the tip though.


73 posted on 01/14/2013 5:16:57 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

He was in jail for tax evasion...


74 posted on 01/14/2013 2:35:22 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

He was in jail for tax evasion...

Whoops, that was Wesley Snipes...


75 posted on 01/14/2013 2:36:49 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
I'll bet you'd be hard pressed to find a successful separationist movement that wasn't full of emotional intensity.

Good leadership can channel those emotions constructively. Bad leadership lets emotions run wild.

Of course, "good leadership" can take what seems like forever to achieve independence, but a recognition that the actual real-time well-being of citizens takes precedence over independence which in turn should prevail over rage and vengeance isn't necessarily a bad thing.

76 posted on 01/14/2013 4:57:16 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson