[2ndDivisionVet]

We weren't able to kill all our opponents in Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia, Afghanistan or Iraq. What makes this "historian" think that the US military could do here what they couldn't do overseas?

[RitchieAprile]

back off, i’m a historian.

big whoop.

[Farmer Dean]

All Mr Ure is doing when writing this trash is getting his name on a bunch of people’s lists.

[Robert357]

I always have felt that those who don't learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat them.

Athens Tennessee is a good example of what armed citizens can do against corrupt politicians. Not the full force of the combined US military, but local government.

It is an interesting story. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5ut6yPrObw And one that should not be forgotten.

[skeeter]

Mr Ure has staked out a 'moderate' position on gun control - he only wants to ban semi-automatic weapons.

Leaving guns lever & bolt action rifles & single action handguns - and muzzle loaders - as the only weapons available to the public.

What an idiot.

[oldenuff2no]

Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,Posse Comitatus Act,

[muir_redwoods]

Some EOs don’t mean large-scale compliance

[Red in Blue PA]

If Jews in Germany had the same arms as the govt does anyone really believe there would have been gas chambers?

[WorkingClassFilth]

Madison, Federalist Paper #46.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

We already have 20,000 gun laws.

Literally.

Let's try repealing a few instead, and see what happens.

[oldenuff2no]

Our military does not do well when fighting people who are fighting for their freedoms on their own turf. We lost in Vietnam and are now leaving Afghanistan before we officially loose that war as well. When the freedom fighters can hit and then fade back into the local civilian population our military is hamstrung. If it happens here it will be Vietnam X 100. The other thing to take a good strong look at is the "oath keepers" If someone really thinks that US military will kill our own people they better think again. It would be much more likely that the military would depose the new dictator and put our country in the hands of the Leader of the House as our new president.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

*** Just because some want to limit gun ownership to non-semi-automatic weapons, doesn’t mean the next step is a total ban on all guns.***

Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.

“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.

Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.

So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time. My estimate is from seven to ten years.

The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.”

-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58

[FlingWingFlyer]

It seems some gun advocates think any gun regulation is the first step to total confiscation of all weapons held in private hands. This is ridiculous and paranoid.

The jughead doesn't have a very good memory does he? They started out asking people to smoke in the back of the airplane. Now, they'll arrest you if you fire one up out in the middle of the Gobi desert in a windstorm. It's the old "camel's nose" technique. It's better to never let them get started.

[FlingWingFlyer]

It seems some gun advocates think any gun regulation is the first step to total confiscation of all weapons held in private hands. This is ridiculous and paranoid.

The jughead doesn't have a very good memory does he? They started out asking people to smoke in the back of the airplane. Now, they'll arrest you if you fire one up out in the middle of the Gobi desert in a windstorm. It's the old "camel's nose" technique. It's better to never let them get started.

[omega4179]

but what good is your AR-15 when you’re fighting the full force of the United States military?

I will go ask the Viet Cong about that.

[CIDKauf]

Check out the “Battle of Athens, TN”
http://voxvocispublicus.homestead.com/Battle-of-Athens.html

[struggle]

Hey historian friend,

1. Who’s to say 1/2 the army defects with their technology?
2. Who’s to say they remainder have to battle 10 million or so angry rednecks all driving toward DC at once?
3. Who’s to say the majority of police will simply abandon their post and protect their families?

[expat2]

Just because some want to limit gun ownership to non-semi-automatic weapons, doesn't mean the next step is a total ban on all guns.

Doesn't this idiot know that semi-automatic weapons make up more than 80% of all new guns sold?

[KarlInOhio]

So if each new round of gun laws only remove half of our freedom, we will never be totally enslaved in the end.

Zeno's paradoxes

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

All it would take is one F-22 pilot and crew on the side of the American people to completely obliterate the D.C. Marxists’ command and control center.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Some regulation didn't mean an end to the First Amendment rights of free speech..

but for decades the "Fairness Doctrine" said that free speech meant that the licensed broadcasting industry (individual radio stations) must offer air time for opposing viewpoints on controversial issues.. or else!

The First Amendment remained but conservative opinion was stifled simply by citizens' (liberal shills') complaints about "fairness" thus threatening the station owners' licenses..

• "You might also think that they would recall the notorious Fairness Doctrine, which was used to 'harass and intimidate' right-wing radio broadcasts, in the words of one unabashed Kennedy-Johnson operative. When that censorious policy was ended in 1987 by former broadcaster Ronald Reagan, there was an explosion of talk formats that gave voice to popular concerns (for a while, Rush Limbaugh even billed himself as equal time)."
• As reported by Fred Friendly in his book appropriately entitled The Good Guys, the Bad Guys, and the First Amendment, this was part of a "massive strategy . . . to challenge and harass the right-wing broadcasters and hope that the challenges would be so costly to them that they would be inhibited, and decide it was too expensive to continue." This strategy was said to have been successful in almost all respects.

a kinda of "Fairness Doctrine" approach would give the illusion that the Second Amendment was respected. Maybe complaints from gun-grabber shills that it's not fair how Joe Gunowner does this or that so he must store his firearms at a government location or something . . . .

The point is: Some regulation didn't mean an end to the First Amendment rights of free speech but . . . .