Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Making “homemade” babies” allowing obviously unstable people to adopt children are serious problems. Kansas has to share blame for destroying the life of at least the last child adopted by Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer. When does somebody do something?
1 posted on 01/02/2013 6:25:19 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

Its never about the chidren, but its all about the selfish desires of the adults. Sad.


2 posted on 01/02/2013 6:32:53 AM PST by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

google Andrew Ellmaker Kansas. Andrew was adopted by a Lesbian couple. Just saying. This has been going on for a long time.


3 posted on 01/02/2013 6:50:15 AM PST by Mercat (Adventures make you late for dinner. Bilbo Baggins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

If the ‘adopted’ parent (not the real mother) agreed to support the child then why aren;t they going after HER for child support?

After all, if a man adopted a child he would be hounded for it.

They want equal rights, after all...


4 posted on 01/02/2013 7:03:59 AM PST by Mr. K (There are lies, dammed lies, statistics, and democrap talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

“homemade baby”

What’s that mean? Aren’t most babies homemade? Some aren’t, like those made in motels, the backseats of cars or the soft grass of a golf course on a starry summer night. But I think most are homemade.


6 posted on 01/02/2013 7:18:58 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

The guy was a sucker. It’s been established law for quite some time in most jurisdictions that one can not assign away his support obligations for his natural child. The contract he signed was never enforceable. Had he spent just a couple hundred bucks talking to a domestic relations attorney before this fiasco he would have saved mucho dinero.


7 posted on 01/02/2013 7:19:49 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; KC_Lion; kearnyirish2

The whole turkey baster line sounds like it was taken from an episode of “Family Guy”.

I just LOVE what American “society” has devolved into. These freaks are going to learn awful quick if/when the ragheads take over.


8 posted on 01/02/2013 7:28:57 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

In a properly ordered American society (much like the one that existed before Woodrow Wilson) this disgrace would be a crime!

It is beyond a doubt a crime and a sin that cries to Heaven for vengeance.


9 posted on 01/02/2013 7:56:06 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

In a properly ordered American society (much like the one that existed before Woodrow Wilson) this disgrace would be a crime!

It is beyond a doubt a crime and a sin that cries to Heaven for vengeance.


10 posted on 01/02/2013 7:58:33 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

If a prostitute or adult actress got pregnant while on the job, would that be a ‘store bought’ baby? I’m trying to figure out what a ‘homemade baby is, and if there is an opposite.


13 posted on 01/02/2013 8:43:04 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to, otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

I figure natural procreation and reproduction will be declared a “hate crime” in the future since it’s “unfair” to homosexuals than the human species can only reproduce itself heterosexually.


17 posted on 01/02/2013 6:37:37 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37; xzins; Clintons Are White Trash; HerrBlucher; mgist; raptor22; victim soul; ...

The words of one of FR’s resident Padres (a title of respect for ALL Chaplains who serve our military), and often very right, on another thread Padre xzins wrote:

It’s a good thing for the FATHER (alias: sperm donor) to be required by law to support his own child.

This underscores a couple of conservative principles:

1. Homosexual couples are not procreative. This is the heart and soul of one major argument against homosexual marriage.

2. Ultimate Responsibility for one’s own procreative activity despite odd schemes and agreements to the contrary.

3. Unnatural marriage deprives a child of a role model whether male or female.


21 posted on 01/02/2013 7:01:29 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson