The words of one of FRs resident Padres (a title of respect for ALL Chaplains who serve our military), and often very right, on another thread Padre xzins wrote:
Its a good thing for the FATHER (alias: sperm donor) to be required by law to support his own child.
This underscores a couple of conservative principles:
1. Homosexual couples are not procreative. This is the heart and soul of one major argument against homosexual marriage.
2. Ultimate Responsibility for ones own procreative activity despite odd schemes and agreements to the contrary.
3. Unnatural marriage deprives a child of a role model whether male or female.
Its a good thing for the FATHER (alias: sperm donor) to be required by law to support his own child.
This underscores a couple of conservative principles:
1. Homosexual couples are not procreative. This is the heart and soul of one major argument against homosexual marriage.
2. Ultimate Responsibility for ones own procreative activity despite odd schemes and agreements to the contrary.
3. Unnatural marriage deprives a child of a role model whether male or female.
**********************************
Well said, and I could not agree more.
Huh?
The Kansas Department for Children and Families is now trying to have Marotta declared the 3-year-old girls father and forced to pay child support. The state contends the agreement is moot because those involved failed to meet the requirement of Kansas statute 23-2208(f) that Schreiner have a licensed physician perform the artificial insemination.
Read more: Kansas Sperm Donor Sued for Child Support After Lesbian Couple Files for Medicaid | GossipOnThis.com