Posted on 12/05/2012 10:46:07 AM PST by Katechon
VIDEO LINK HERE
At the very least Ann is anywhere from 17 to 25 years late. I started seeing signs of an impending crisis or a conflict coming after Bush one started speaking about a New World Order and the first World Trade Center attack. But for me the biggest signs were between 98 and 2002. With the Clinton impeachment, the close election in 2000, and 9/11. It just confirmed what I had felt years earlier.
yeah I agree.
The collective audiences of Rush, Hannity and Levin would p*ss their pants listening to Ann’s latest...
Yep, just as Rush supports Apple with his purchases and millions in free advertising.
All while they work against Conservative causes.
Major WOW. Let the counter revolution begin!
So I’m either with her, or I’m the enemy now?
PFL
She had very interesting commentary about the 19th Amendment at the end of the video...never looked at it as a tool to divide the family.
How to fight a Satanic Government—leave your job—go on welfare. Demand the most from the state—Use your time to advocate for change. If you must—Go Underground. Be a Blank—no record of your existence. Use barter-—Blank is Beautiful.
Use the tools of the enemy to undo him. It will happen in time. Took 75 years to have the USSR fall—may well take a century to Stop ObamaAmerica.
I agree with her that the republic is dead. Historians trace the death of the Roman republic to Julius Caesar when he crossed the Rubicon river to engage in Civil War. I think historians will trace the end of our republic to the day in 2008 that the SCOTUS did not look into the eligibility of Obama, which was their job. They didn’t do it because they feared the political consequences. The SCOTUS has been granted lifetime employment for that very reason, that they wouldn’t need to consider political consequences in upholding the constitution. They failed our republic.
I agree with her that the republic is dead. Historians trace the death of the Roman republic to Julius Caesar when he crossed the Rubicon river to engage in Civil War. I think historians will trace the end of our republic to the day in 2008 that the SCOTUS did not look into the eligibility of Obama, which was their job. They didn’t do it because they feared the political consequences. The SCOTUS has been granted lifetime employment for that very reason, that they wouldn’t need to consider political consequences in upholding the constitution. They failed our republic.
Do you think the radical Marxists fear you? They don’t. And nothing will change until they do.
.
TOTAL RESISTANCE - Swiss Army Guide to Guerrilla Warfare and Underground Operations by Major H. von Dach Bern (1965).
Under $10 on Amazon
Three color changes gave me a headache and lost my attention completely.
If you think such garish exhibitionism attracts folks to your message, you need to buy several more clues.
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.Now, let's extrapolate that list of complaints to a hypothetical country in some parallel universe that is in its own 21st Century and that is roughly modeled on our present-day America. Are the denizens of that hypothetical world there yet; i.e. are they at the same breaking point that the Framers were in 1776? Not even close, though the definition of 'close' depends on how fast their King Hussein wants to move things along in that direction. They may wake up one morning and find he has moved with breathtaking speed overnight.In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
- He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
- He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
- He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
- He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
- He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
- He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
- He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
- He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
- He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
- He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
- He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
- He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
- He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
- For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
- For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
- For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
- For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
- For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
- For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
- For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
- For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
- For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
- He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
- He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
- He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
- He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
- He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
The thing our budding hypothetical resistance in the alternate universe lacks, which the Framers had in spades, is leadership -- both in the political and military spheres. For instance, has the main conservative party in this parallel world opposed their President Zilch "with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people?" Don't make me laugh. A Congressman named Boner? Furthermore, is there a large cadre of brilliant military minds with impressive West Point pedigrees and plenty of battlefield victories under their belts, publicly pronouncing they'll support a hypothetical limited-government resistance? No. In this hypothetical world, only one general has said anything about it. Do not think for a moment that those poor unfortunate, tyrannized, hypothetical folks can win without that. They cannot. Both the Framers and the Confederacy had lots of impressive military and political leaders, yet victory was far from certain. Our hypothetical conservative Flatlanders have neither -- just like the real world on which they are modeled.
That's why I get so irritated at people who say things like, "from my cold dead hands... blah, blah, blah," as if they think that'll stop tyrants. Yeah, right... What are you going to do, make your last stand on your front porch, while seated in your rocking chair, and sacrifice your life? For what, a gun? Either you believe gun control is a totally hopeless endeavor and guns will always be available, or you do not. If they come for your guns, best let them have whatever you have in the house (hopefully, you've cached most of them by now anyway, right?) and live to fight another day.
One can always replace a gun, but is worth nothing to a hypothetical resistance if he is dead and mouldering in the ground.
“At the very least Ann is anywhere from 17 to 25 years late.”
You must be realatively young. It started in 1917 in what is now and was then Russia. Russia has not abandoned their plan for a world dominated by communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
