Obama won a second term, but Obamacare is in big trouble. Ballot initiatives to assert state control over health care passed with 77% support in Wyoming, 62% in Missouri and 59% in Alabama. And yesterday, Governor Bentley from Alabama announced he wouldn't do the exchange, and suggested a "significant number" of governors would also refuse. Meanwhile 30 more anti-Obamacare lawsuits are waiting in the wings. So, let's not be discouraged. Let's work hard to help States stop national health care.
Our motto: Resist. Repeal. Reclaim.
To: TurboZamboni
Amen. We can STILL defeat this power grab, if not completely, then substantially. Don’t give up the ship!
2 posted on
11/14/2012 2:09:17 PM PST by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: TurboZamboni
WRT the title...
3 posted on
11/14/2012 2:10:23 PM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: TurboZamboni
So what?
It’ll go to the Supreme Court where the justices will declare it means whatever the heck they want it to mean.
“No individual...” will end up meaning “every individual must...”
6 posted on
11/14/2012 2:13:15 PM PST by
Brookhaven
(theconservativehand.com - alt2p.com)
To: TurboZamboni
Wouldn’t that be something if this law forced states to assert their rights in a more decisive fashion since before the civil war.
7 posted on
11/14/2012 2:17:19 PM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: TurboZamboni
Ya ... but none of the associated taxes will go away.
9 posted on
11/14/2012 2:21:30 PM PST by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: TurboZamboni
The “no one” referred to is to health INSURERS not to the people who purchase health care insurance. Thus, no company (or individual) that offers health insurance is required to participate. I wonder if that applies to people who self-insure? I doubt it. That woud too easy a loophole.
To: TurboZamboni
This line seems to be referring to the actual insurers - not those providing isurance for their companies under Obamacare. In other words, State Farm Insurance Company is not required to participate in Obamacare, as it is providing insurance coverage for Obamacare.
It’s an exemption for insurance companies - ironic, eh?
12 posted on
11/14/2012 2:26:44 PM PST by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: TurboZamboni
Obama can thank Reid and Pelosi for this flaw. They cobbled together this monstrosity in the middle of the night with lawyers representing unions, pharmaceutical makers, health insurers, trial lawyers, and public hospitals. Like a Rube Goldberg contraption it will collapse under the weight of its over built parts.
14 posted on
11/14/2012 2:28:59 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: TurboZamboni
some of you geniuses can figure out if this is accurate.
so many people who are on our side have read through this...if this were true, I have to believe someone at Heritage or CATO or someplace like that would have seen it.
To: TurboZamboni
chinks in its armor I'm sorry, Twila Brase, didn't you get the memo that this phrase was racist?
20 posted on
11/14/2012 3:03:28 PM PST by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
To: TurboZamboni
So “chink in armor” is a term now?
21 posted on
11/14/2012 3:10:30 PM PST by
gilor
(Pull the wool over your own eyes!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson