Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2012 9:08:36 PM PST by SquarePants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SquarePants

stay out da bushes.


2 posted on 11/09/2012 9:09:53 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants
At least not Jeb. I hear George P Bush is the next.


5 posted on 11/09/2012 9:18:28 PM PST by tsowellfan (Allen West for Speaker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

This George P guy should run on his military record. Young guy who came of age right around 9-11. Must surely have some time in Uniform.


7 posted on 11/09/2012 9:19:54 PM PST by Dagnabitt (If I had a failed President, he'd look like Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

Too bad he’s a Bush. Definitely looks Hispanic. DEFINITELY good looking—to those that care.


10 posted on 11/09/2012 9:25:22 PM PST by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

how about no family political dynasties whatsoever

those in these dynasties say they are just very “public service” minded

but my own view is that they don’t see themselves as doing anything better for themselves than what they might do banking on the family name

it is done in businesses and industries as well

I just don’t think its good for good government


15 posted on 11/09/2012 9:47:49 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants
Frankly, I am done with the GOP, it is an elitist, neo-Con, N.E.establishment Party.

It won't allow opposition from the Evangelicals, Liberatrians or TeaParty.

It is time to let them win elections without us.

18 posted on 11/09/2012 10:10:34 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

None other than the CBC was already talking about a possible Jeb Bush run next on right in election night.


21 posted on 11/09/2012 10:15:34 PM PST by Republican1795.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

What about no more stupid articles?


22 posted on 11/09/2012 10:18:33 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants
Any contender must stand up and call the opponant rat out on their crap. It is not going negative to expose and reiterate the truth.

Without it, limp wristing wins nothing, and the media, which is the actual rat party, the politicians being an extension therof, will eat them up whole.

25 posted on 11/09/2012 10:37:13 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

Oh puleeeze......:(


27 posted on 11/09/2012 10:38:20 PM PST by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

28 posted on 11/09/2012 10:41:30 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

“On the heels of Ronald Reagan, the GOP could have gotten a chef salad elected president in 1988.”

I disagree with the article on that point. The GOP brand was a little bruised in 88. Nothing like the toxic levels of 2008, but between the Savings and Loans scandals, questions about H.W.’s role (if any) in Iran-Contra, and some other issues, a GOP win was anything but certain in 88. Had the DNC run a southern Democrat (or pretty much anyone else but Mike “The Human Punching Bag” Dukakis), it would have been a close race, IMHO.

I agree, though, that H.W. moved away from Reagan’s principles on domestic policy at warp speed. He never really believed in them anyway, if one remembers the 1980 primaries.

I’d still take him in a heartbeat over Obama, of course.


29 posted on 11/09/2012 10:43:19 PM PST by DemforBush (100% Ex-Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

So, you think it runs in his genes or something?
Why not examine what the guy actually thinks and believes?
Look at what he says and actually DOES.
It looks like he’s going for Texas office of some kind ... fine ... let’s see what he actually does in government before he’s rejected out of hand.

Looking at his educational path, it’s certainly different from the other Bushes ... Rice and the University of Texas Law School. Both are excellent programs, and not part of the Ivy League world and all the connections that brings. Who knows???

I’m willing to watch and wait and see what he says and does. If he gets into office and serves ably and holds solid positions and articulates a vision and agenda with which I — as a Conservative — can agree ... and if he serves at the National Level (House or Senate) and has a good Conservative Voting Record ... WHO KNOWS? Just because he’s a “Bush” doesn’t mean that, by 2024 or 2028 he won’t be a possible contender for the Presidency.

And, who knows, perhaps by 2024 the Democrats will have stopped claiming all their messes on GWB.


30 posted on 11/09/2012 10:47:09 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off"M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SquarePants

GOP elites -> rove -> bush -> obama 1.0 & obama 2.0


32 posted on 11/10/2012 12:00:20 AM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson