Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Rogue”U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya Stand-Down Order
The Tea Party Tribune ^ | October 28th, 2012 | The Daily Sheeple

Posted on 10/29/2012 6:00:47 PM PDT by Texas Fossil

The official story surrounding the events of September 11, 2012 in Bengzahi, Libya which left four Americans dead, has now officially fallen apart.

After numerous flips and flops by the Obama administration, which originally attempted to paint the incident as a Muslim outcry over an anti-Islamic video, whistle blowers throughout the U.S. government, including within the White House, the State Department, national intelligence agencies and the U.S.military have made available stunning details that suggest not only did operational commanders have live visual and audio communications from drones overhead and intelligence assets on the ground, but that some commanders within the military were prepared to go-it-alone after being told to “stand down.”

Africom commanding officer U.S. General Carter Ham, after being ordered to essentially surrender control of the situation to alleged Al Queda terrorists and let Americans on the ground die, made the unilateral decision to ignore orders from the Secretary of Defense and activated special operations teams at his disposal for immediate deployment to the area.

According to reports, once the General went rogue he was arrested within minutes by his second in command and relieved of duty.

--

“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

--

The question now is whether the American people will hold to account the chain of command responsible for leaving our people behind, fabricating a politically expedient story, and continuing to sell the now defunct lie(s) even after all of their variations of the story were found to be false and misleading.

A General who made the decision to assist diplomatic and intelligence assets on the ground has been arrested and will likely be retired or worse, while those who ordered the removal of embassy security details and ordered U.S. forces to stand-down are left to go on about their business and likely risk more American lives in the future.

In some circles the actions of those at the very top of the command structure during the Bengzahi attacks would be considered traitorous.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: africom; arrested; benghazi; benghazigate; carterham; general; generalham; ham; libya; relieved; shadowwars; standdown; threatmatrix; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: SunkenCiv
thehellion
61 posted on 10/29/2012 9:51:35 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nitehawk0325

Biden would be a better CIC than Obama. At least he was American born and raised. He may be stupid, but that is better than an evil, intelligence that is systematically destroying our Country. Biden also would not be electable for President at all, in any fashion.


62 posted on 10/29/2012 10:17:59 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Has anyone seen anything more about possible gunrunning going on from Libya to Syria? This, it seems, could explain a lot.


63 posted on 10/29/2012 10:26:18 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Saw this somewhere else too, only they used the word “apprehended” for “arrested”.


64 posted on 10/29/2012 11:07:01 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

And on September 10, the USS John C. Stennis strike group was in port in Thailand, so it doesn’t make sense that Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaoutte’s being relieved of duty had anything to do with the Libyan affair either. But it is a fun coincidence.


65 posted on 10/29/2012 11:12:35 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Soebarkah Soetoro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Placemark.


66 posted on 10/29/2012 11:19:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Rodríguez, his replacement, needs to be confirmed by Congress.


67 posted on 10/30/2012 1:05:04 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower
possible gunrunning?

Of course, Is is a given. It was happening. Same who overthrew Gadaffi are in Syria. And Obozo was supplying arms, including stinger missiles.

Assad is an evil man, but these vermin (al Qeada affiliates) are much much worse.

68 posted on 10/30/2012 6:02:26 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil; Travis McGee; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; LonePalm; Ernest_at_the_Beach; navyvet

Ham apparently is still around giving speeches and is listed as still in charge of the post.

Possibly what might have happened is what has happened a few times in our military.

Ham may have been relieved of his duty by his XO until the crisis was over.

Below is a clear explanation of our own Travis Mcgee about what has to happen to have our military cross foriegn boarders. (CBA or Cross-Border Authority).

Forget your emotions and read what Travis has posted:

Our own Travis Mcgee, a former seal officer, has been trying to clarify why there was a no go. Forget everything we have seen in movies, have seen or heard on tv about this no go op.

Below is a link to how Travis explains why there was a no go. Obozo did not approve it.

“Did Obama withhold Cross-Border Authority?

Please help me. I am trying as hard as I can to get out the word about cross-border authority. I just can’t believe reporters don’t know enough to ask the right questions! It’s infuriating. Libya, as far as standing down the rescue, is 100% Obama’s show, and nobody else’s. Only he can grant CBA, not Biden, not Panetta, not Dempsey, not Hillary, and certainly not Ham in Germany.

The entire episode is explained perfectly inside the context of not granting CBA. The CIA QRF in Tripoli? No problem, send them on the local Tripoli station chief’s say-so. He merely informs up COC that he has done so. CCs them so to speak. “This is what I am doing.” Ditto if Predators were in country, no problem using them.

But the big rescue air armada streaming toward Libya right away after the alarm got to Stuttgart and Africom? That has to stop. I believe at the 5pm meeting with Panetta and Biden in the Oval Office, he said, “No outside military intervention,” on the basis that the last report was the “lull” from the consulate, at about 1030 p.m. in Benghazi, when the attack appeared to be over and the situation stabilizing.

(As a soft exception, Obama may have authorized sending an unarmed Predator from outside of Libya, but I am thinking the two Predators were already in-country, and hence available to use within “no CBA granted” rules.)

“No outside military intervention” equals “no cross-border authority” and that constitutes “standing orders” until POTUS changes them. Nobody else can “un-decide” the POTUS decree. The rescue air-armada of C-17s, C-130s and SOF helos like MH-47 Chinooks and Pavehawks cannot proceed directly to Libya without CBA being granted, so instead they are all staged at Sigonella, Sicily.

USN ships are in position to “lilypad” helos for long over-water flights. Airborne tankers are coming into position. SOF forces in Sigonella are going over their gear for different contingencies. Fuming all night as officers keep checking in with operational commanders. “Hold in place, no rescue yet. We can’t find the President, it sounds like,” say the colonels to the majors and captains. 100s of military must know about this. I keep waiting for the conclusive whistle-blowers to come forward BEFORE the election. After won’t matter, it will be for the historians.

Panetta is falling on his sword for Obama with his absurd-on-its-face, “The military doesn’t do risky things” defense of no rescue. Panetta is destroying his future reputation entirely, to save Obama. The question is why? Loyalty?

Petreaus was probably “used” in some way early, about the supposed CIA intel link to the Mohammed video, and now he feels burned. So he conclusively said via his PAO, “The stand-down order did not come from CIA.” Well, what is higher than CIA? Only White House. Obama, nobody else. Petreaus is naming Obama without naming him.

Now, as far as Obama / Huma Abedin / Valerie Jarrett etc actually wanting Ambassador Stevens dead, to terminate the end of the very dirty Libyan arms to Syrian AQ programs, I can’t speculate. Obama is not competent enough I’m thinking.

But for sure, the ambassador going to unsecure Benghazi on 9-11 of all days stinks to me of a setup. You can bet Stevens would have told the Turks, “No, 9-11 is not a good day for us,” and stayed in Tripoli behind many high and thick walls. For him to go to dangerous Benghazi on 9-11 means the Turks totally insisted, but why would they care about the meeting date, unless they were in on a “hit” as the Judas goat?

Alternatively, ordering Stevens to meet the Turks in Benghazi on 9-11 may have come from down OUR chain of command. Stevens seems to have been wearing two hats as ambassador and CIA arms shipper. Moving between more-secure Tripoli, the Benghazi “consulate,” and the CIA “annex.” So orders to him might come down the State or the CIA commo channels, or both. I am unclear on his job title and true position, but either the CIA or State sends him final instructions. How this works with “dual-hatted” ambassadors, I haven’t a clue.

But Stevens meeting the Turks at the unsecure Benghazi “consulate” on 9-11 stinks to me of a deliberate setup. The Turks left the meeting and probably flashed their headlights to the attack team commanders lurking in shadows. A coded text, a word on a phone, meaning, “The ambassador is there, with minimal security: proceed with the attack plan.”

But that is all pure speculation. What I know FOR SURE is that the big “stand down order” issue revolves around granting or withholding cross-border authority.

Every SOF officer and ops officer all the way up has this drummed into his head. We can make Obama respond to this question, even if reporters must shout it at him while he’s doing storm cleanup photo ops. If the reporters KNOW enough to ask the quesion. That’s why I am shouting all over the internet about CBA.

I can’t believe cross-border authority permission is not one of the top discussion points about Benghazi.

That, and who “set him up” by sending him to Beghazi to meet the Turks on 9-11, with them leaving after dark.

And of course, down the road, was the military rescue-in-progress turned back because Obama actually wanted to make sure the consulate was wiped out? Is that why the spooks at the annex were refused permission to travel the under one mile to intervene? That would connect it all together, but for now, the best focus is on Obama either granting or withholding cross-border authority for the rescue.

Feel free to repost these musings of a long-ago SOF officer anywhere you please.

17 posted on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:24:09 AM by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)


Now from Grampa Dave: “Please help Travis get this message out re CBA.”

Left wing presidents from LBJ to the current traitor, have left our military men in peril or allowed them to be captured when our military was ready to rescue them.

Think of the men on the Pueblo and Liberty with LBJ playing the role of POTUS. There have been scores of similar incidents where our left wing presidents abandoned our military personnel, who were doing their mission by failing to allow/authorize CBA.

This may be the first time that embassy personnel and other non active military were abandoned by a left wing potus.


69 posted on 10/30/2012 8:27:52 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are the 53%, who pay taxes and keep this country going inspite of the 47% rat moochers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

Leon, Leon, you FUBAR fool. We knew exactly what was going on. Our people were being attacked. We knew exactly where it was happening. You guys were watching it live. You had greater and more immediate intelligence than anyone did for any battle back in WWII. You knew that people were launching mortar rounds. You knew where they were. You and Barry chose to do nothing. You let our people die. You let the terrorists win and get away (those who weren't killed by our people already there).
70 posted on 10/30/2012 8:35:32 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; TigersEye; Marine_Uncle; onyx; Fred Nerks; SunkenCiv; blam; GeronL
Thanks for the post regarding the CBA.

That all makes sense.

71 posted on 10/30/2012 10:12:09 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

UPDATE:

General Ham is retiring from the force
By James S. Robbins - The Washington Times

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/29/general-center-benghazi-gate-controversy-retiring/

General Carter F. Ham, the Combatant Commander of Africa Command (AFRICOM) and a key figure in the Benghazi-gate controversy, is leaving the Army. On October 18, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta had announced that General Ham would be succeeded at AFRICOM by General David Rodriguez. Later speculation tied this decision to the fallout from the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens. However on Monday October 29 a defense official told The Washington Times that “the decision [to leave AFRICOM] was made by General Ham. He ably served the nation for nearly forty years and retires after a distinguished career.” Previously all that was known was that General Ham would be rotating out of AFRICOM at some future date, but not that he was leaving the service. General Ham is a few years short of the mandatory retirement age of 64, but it is not unusual for someone of that rank to retire after serving in such a significant command.

The questions concerning General Ham’s role in the September 11 events continue to percolate. Congressman Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican, said that General Ham told him during a visit to Libya that he had never been asked to provide military support for the Americans under attack in Benghazi. Former United States Ambassador to the U.N. John R, Bolton also mentioned Mr. Chaffetz’s account, and contrasted it with Mr. Panetta’s statement that General Ham had been part of the team that made the decision not to send in forces. “General Ham has now been characterized in two obviously conflicting ways,” Mr. Bolton concluded. “Somebody ought to find out what he actually was saying on September the eleventh.”

No word yet on when General Ham’s rotation or retirement take effect.


72 posted on 10/30/2012 11:26:31 AM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

Thanks for the update.


73 posted on 10/30/2012 11:55:37 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We are the 53%, who pay taxes and keep this country going inspite of the 47% rat moochers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/robbins-report/2012/oct/29/general-center-benghazi-gate-controversy-retiring/

He is ‘voluntarily’ leaving. According to this article. Suspicious timing to say the least. Perhaps he was Advised to resign.


74 posted on 10/30/2012 1:42:42 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I had been saying for weeks Stevens was wearing two hats. Thanks for the ping.


75 posted on 10/30/2012 1:55:45 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

Heard from a friend close to the situation. Not relieved, departing under normal circumstances in a change of command planned this summer.


76 posted on 10/30/2012 2:05:13 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: eartick
Eartick, I’m all for what you are saying but once Zero is voted out, his regime goes into the lame duck session. No one, even democrats, will vote for what he wants. Even if he does executive orders, they can be counter acted by Romney on January 20th.
77 posted on 10/30/2012 2:26:35 PM PDT by Nitehawk0325 (Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eartick
Eartick, I’m all for what you are saying but once Zero is voted out, his regime goes into the lame duck session. No one, even democrats, will vote for what he wants. Even if he does executive orders, they can be counter acted by Romney on January 20th.
78 posted on 10/30/2012 2:26:47 PM PDT by Nitehawk0325 (Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil; All
This segment on Hannity last might made me cry. Please share with others. Thanks!

Powerful Hannity Show - 10/29/12 - Father of SEAL Ty Woods killed in Libya demands truth from WH

79 posted on 10/30/2012 2:35:39 PM PDT by Larousse2 (The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I should have added. If Issa’s crew let these clowns off the hook, all bets are off the Republican side of Congress have any clout. The so called independent investigative committee are probably commissioned to carefully keep things as “foggy” as possible.


80 posted on 10/30/2012 3:01:33 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson