The author's attempt at satire falls flat. Also, look at the reader comments.
“Hi! I’m a rapist. I’m one of those men who likes to force myself on women without their consent or desire and then batter them sexually”
Hi Bill Clinton!
Postmodernist libtards reject absolutes such as life begins at conception and abortion is murder. They are intent on eliminating religious roots and transcendent qualities from Western law. They desire more fragmentation and subjectivity, and less objective morality than the Judeo-Christian tradition demands In the end, they are intent on creating and using their own brand of social justice merely for left-wing political purposes. Thus, the law is no longer a God-ordained, objective standard by which to judge behavior and maintain an ordered society, but a weapon to beat political opponents into submission to a point of view.
>>Every time you say “I oppose a woman’s right to abortion, even in cases of rape,” what you’re also saying is “I believe that a man who rapes a woman has more of a right to control a woman’s body and life than that woman does.”<<
The number of logical fallacies in that statement is staggering. And that is the thesis statement so the entire nonsensical piece fails.
I love when you try to make distinctions about “forcible rape” or “legitimate rape”...
Kinda gave it away right there: scumbags (rapists) do not care a whit about distinguishing "forcible" and "legitimate". They probably can't even spell "legitimate", much less know what it means.
The Dems are really scared. They are reaching so far on this election. After it's all over, people are going to be appalled at the lengths they went to hoodwink voters,