Certainly, communications were directed to a specific individual. If we have the written directives, who are they addressed to and what did that person do with them? Better yet, why are we having to ask these questions instead of those we elect to speak for us?
I would not put anything past this man. He will stoop to any level to keep his hold on the White House.
Take a look at that woman who testified at the congressional hearings. Brilliant Mata-Hari or feckless bureaucrat?
Think of this as “Fast and Furious” with jihadi twist...
Thank you for this post. There is much in it worthy of more consideration and investigation.
I have thought much the same as you with regard to whether or not this was an internal operation, an “October surprise”, designed to bolster Obama’s bona fides as a strong, war-time leader. Obviously, he isn’t one.
Where I differ with you is your apparent exoneration of Obama and Hillary from planning and executing this. Why do you think they were not the perpetrators in this conjectured scenario? Why not Hillary alone as the instigator through the Muslim Brotherhood via Huma?
Further, when the White House, the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the several branches of the military, the Sec’y of State’s office and other alphabets all watched the attack in real time for SIX straight hours, why was nothing done to help? Who ordered the drone overhead and who positioned the satellite overhead so all these folks could watch and listen as the attack began and progressed. Where are the videos now? Why have these people been silenced by Panetta? Where was Obama during this attack? Where was Hillary? For that matter, where was Huma Weiner? (I assume she took the rat’s name).
I've seen the hypothesis that the security was removed as part of an October Surprise that backfired and went horribly wrong ( what Hussein 0bama plan hasn't?) Unless members of the 0bama regime, including Barry himself, are prosecuted, we will probably never know the truth, and maybe not even then.
Fortunately all Romney has to stress is the deliberate weakening of security over the objections of everyone who knew anything.
This is going to be the worst asskicking in a debate EVAH.
All the facts of your “conspiracy theory” are accurate.
If you look back at Clinton leading up to the 911 attack, Obama is following the same game. Clinton had the first WTC attack and then turned all the homeland security power he got in the aftermath, towards his political and social enemies in the name of that evil guy McVeigh.
I think the Clintonistas covered up McVeigh’s connection to Islamists so Clinton could attach the crime to his political enemies and win an election. John Doe II was covered up, as well as McVeigh traveling to meet with jihandists in the Philippines.
Clinton played down and denied the threat of jihadists just like Bammy is doing. The jihadists freely operated to create 911 in the aftermath of the first Trade Center bombing. Then Bush got elected and boom! And Bush/Rove caved to clintonista pressure and put their people on the 911 commission...
That will happen to Romney if he wins and is not quick to clean out the set up of Obama who has been much more radical in his jihadist activism and persecution of his political and social enemies (Republican voters).
Obama has geared a much more powerful homleand inSecurity against veterns and conservative. In the meantime, he’s almost abetting jihadists to take over the Middle East, murder the ambassador of Libya and placing Taliban on our bases in Afghanistan to murder our soldier. I won’t go into Obama’s suicidal rules of engagment.
So there. I’m a nut. :) Romney better be on top of things fast...or it’s 911, only worse, all over again.