Replies

Think of this as “Fast and Furious” with jihadi twist...

I believe this was an October surprise that went very south. One area people are not discussing is the role of Morsi and aid to Egypt in this entire disaster. There was a great deal of pressure on the administration to block further aid from the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt. The Arab Spring was one of the most Orwellian accomplishments of Obama. Without the aid, one of the hallmark and perverted foreign policy accomplishments of Obama would be at risk of failure.

Now assume this was a staged kidnapping. Who else could of brokered a "deal" for Stevens. Of course Morsi would have been well positioned. This would have provided Obama the necessary pressure on congress to provide the Egyptian Government with Financial aid. Further, Obama could then brag about his success in foreign policy. Finally, out of humanitarian thankfulness Obama would release the Blind Sheik back to Egypt.

I believe these were all factors in this failed treasonous act.

bingo, I could be wrong but my sense is that Ambassador Stevens was a liaison between the US and Turkey to smuggle weapons to the Syrian rebels. Obviously Assad and Iran stopped it. Considering the obozo admins lack of experience, Obozo likely thought since the US was arranging the provision of weapons for the anti-government rebels that the Libyan embassies would be immune from being attacked. Just like in F & F, his plan backfired and Americans died.

I’ve seen that, and of course Assad surely could have provided support to the attackers, or even contracted them expressly for this, under a false Al Qaida flag.

Stevens had just ended a meeting with the Turkish Ambassador, which he apparently didn’t want to do in Tripoli, so maybe that was behind the scenes. But it seems as if Obama, and Hillary (and their little F&F II) couldn’t have benefitted from pulling the Marine guards, if that was the case. So I see this post as being a slightly different issue, relating to our letting hostile elements gain influence within our government bureaucracies.

Why was Stevens stripped so completely of security, and forced to stay in a compound, deep in militant territory, with only 5 DSS personell, many of which were manning camera feeds? How did that battle field get prepped, and who did it?

Obama and Hillary just don’t seem to benefit from stripping him of security. Any F&F II doesn’t benefit from seeing the Marines pulled either. IF they were running a Covert Op, leaving teh Ambassador open to being killed by his target would seem poor planning, as it would risk the Operation becomming open.

The only way I see the Marine guards pulled, the SOF security team pulled, the DSS team which was pulled pulled, and their security airfleet pulled, is if this operation had assets on the inside, managing the bureaucracy at State, and providing logistical support by hogtying our ability to defend against the attack.

I will bet, regardless of this case, we will see such an coordinated operation in the future, if we keep letting the enemies within our gates, and giving them the power to deny assests to operators on the ground.