Coulter: ‘White liberals are always threatening black riots’ on verge of election losses

Daily Caller ^ | October 16, 2012 | Jeff Poor

[Windflier]

Algore sure does like ‘em greasy, doesn’t he?

[Feckless]

At least I wait until they start rioting... and color is not an issue, rioting is.

[CatherineofAragon]

Yeah, well, I’d like to tell old Maxine that the next time her people decide to have a “revolution” and burn down their neighborhoods, we’re not going to rebuild. Let them live in the ruins.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

She must do chakras and not be very particular about it.

[SaraJohnson]

Liberals’ efforts to egg on blacks to riot for white Democrats when they lose elections has not been successful in a long time.

But egging them onto violence and mayhem for a black racist like Bammy will be more successful this time. Cell phones don’t have to be cut off as an excuse. Racism is the motivation. The violence is being inspired by black hatred for whites who liberals are blaming for defeating Obama’s skin color. Liberals have made Obama a black skin dominance struggle. The thugs will fall for it.

[GOPJ]

“I think the threats to riot and the claim that abortion will be somehow miraculously be illegal in places like California and New York is not going to swing the undecided voters here,” Coulter said. “I will note that white liberals are always threatening black riots whenever they’re about to lose an election. Al [Gore] did it in 2000.”

isn't that insulting to black citizens?Al Gore did this too? I'm amazed black people vote to keep white liberal elites in power.

[wtc911]

and color is not an issue....

___________________________________

Sure, that's why you included the "Blacks" part.

[MHGinTN]

Lots of misdirection going on ... the real scandal is the Soros owned vote counting companies in Spain hired to count the American election results. By continuing these diversions, the real criminal enterprise remains in tact abd hidden.

[MHGinTN]

Ann is getting prettier as she ages.

[Feckless]

it was part of the quote, moron

[wtc911]

Yep, the part you reacted to...your post was very clear, you know it, we know it. It’s always fun to watch you guys try to walk back your nonsense.

[Feckless]

The “Part I reacted to” was the gist of the post. It was clear because I meant for it to be. I’m not walking back anything, I will be more than glad to rid the world of rioting scum if the situation should arise. Hope to see you out there with them :)

[wtc911]

bottom line...

Someone suggests Blacks will riot and your reaction, felt strongly enough to publish, is "good" I get a chance to try out my ammo.

Nothing ambiguous about that at all. Why not just man up and own your words...

[Feckless]

I did, I do, I will