Posted on 10/11/2012 7:46:40 PM PDT by publius321
The technical psychiatric term for that type of behavior is...acting like a shmuck.
It was a trial run, Obama will smirk, laugh and make an even bigger asshole of himself, just to keep Romney off base in the public perception.
Arguing logically against emotion is unsatisfactory to south of Market.
“His laughter was at inappropriate times - mental illness...does he drink?”
No.
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/04/us/biden-resting-after-surgery-for-second-brain-aneurysm.html
The current ROEs suggest otherwise. If that is the objective it would be better to go in and seriously break stuff, then wait a short while to see if the lesson needs to be repeated.
Killing off two generations should result in 40 yrs. of relative quiet.
True.Maybe someday the GOP will insist on having a moderator who does not hate them.
A consummation devoutly to be wished . . . but I dont expect to see it. The reason is simple - journalism controls the TV time and the microphones - and journalism wants journalist moderators.The only way to change the debates would be to pass a law revoking FCC licenses for stations which dont give time for unmoderated debates, in which microphone time is allocated via a chess timer controlling the microphones. That would require Republican majorities in both houses of Congress and a Republican POTUS - and guts. At least as much guts as Reagan showed in discarding the Fairness Doctrine.
It was bad enough with Biden being so rude and puerile and interrupting all the time, but when the moderator kept interrupting—trying to make Ryan lose his train of thought-—I almost turned off the debate.
Under the enormous disadvantage, Ryan came off looking extremely classy and mature. The other two looked like rude obnoxious OWS types or sodomites attacking the Cathedral in S.F. with condoms.
Two more people prove that there is no morality and character on the left in Alinsky’s world. Degeneracy breeds degeneracy—like the Bible says.
Thanks for the clear concise assessment HH.
>> but when the moderator kept interrupting
She was pathetic, but not as pathetic as the jackass.
It went almost exactly as I expected. The only ones who could’ve been surprised are the ones who thought this would be a replay of Romney trouncing the putzident. Biden’s been shuckin’ an’ smirkin’ his way thru politics for 35 years; this was just another gig for him. No big deal; his true believing jackoffs got what he always guarantees them, but he didn’t inspire any new votes.
As a general rule every time a liberal moderator or interviewer gives their biased views as part of a question the answer needs to be: “If the American public wanted to hear your opinions they would have voted for you in the primaries.”
“does he drink?”
Biden is “overserved” on a nightly basis. Nuff said?
I had the picture on, but the sound down (I have a hard time watching these things, know that the moderator is in the tank for the Dims).
Anyway, it seemed that every time I looked over and saw Biden, he had this strange, smirky, ‘aren’t you an idiot’ kind of look on his face. It struck me as so bizarre that I actually watched for awhile to see if it was an aberration, but no.
Do these people (Dims) ever just come in, say what they want to say in good sportsmanship and a gentlemanly manner?
I am afraid only the destruction of Islam will bring peace.
Should one start at the centers and work out or start at the periphery (or both)?
These are questions above my pay grade. Only God knows how to deal with this problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.