I’m looking at all three verification letters here. AZ, MISS, KS.
The only one where an embossed stamp is visible (starkly and clearly visible) is the one for Mississippi.
That letter only states only two things.
1) They have an original record for Obastard.
2) The information MATCHES the fake PDF website image.
All three letters have been initialed by somebody other than Onaka. gk, BP, ALO (or AZO)
Once they start to get into details, the embossed seal stamp does not appear to be used. Why?
The only difference that I can see between the Mississippi letter and the Kansas letter is that the Kansas letter mentions the birth certificate number 151 61 10641.
If there really is no embossed seal on the two letters that ask for details (as it appears), that seems significant to me because as if we suspect that birth certificate number belongs to somebody else the certification process seems to
take a dive here. No embossed seal, no certification.
It’s also strange that the letters use the phrase “reviewed by me” and then Onaka has to have somebody initial the stamp. I realize he has secretarial staff but with all the hullabaloo about the birth certificate you’d think he could certify these few letters all by himself.
ATO would be Alvin T Onaka. That’s the one on the MDEC verification, IIRC.
The MDEC verification is probably the closest we’ll come to a standard certified verification, but the request was never made on a standard verification application form so the content on it is totally different than a response to a standard verification application.
I think what’s going on here is that there are 2 different BC’s for Obama. The only way they could claim that 151-61-10641 was on a record for Obama is if he was given somebody else’s BC#, according to the 2 mutually-exclusive numbering methods described by past or present HDOH officials as having been in use then. And the only place where they are authorized to create a new BC with a different BC# is in HRS 338-17.7, where they are allowed to make a new BC saying whatever law enforcement tells them to put on it, in order to protect the registrant.
But that procedure is only allowed if the registrant was born in Hawaii (which can’t be known from Obama’s original non-valid record), and it doesn’t give them the right to steal somebody else’s BC# (who would then have to be assigned a different number even though they were not in danger and there was therefore no lawful authorization for their number to be changed).
So that 2nd BC that was created, under the guise of protecting Obama from us “violent birthers”, is not lawful, since Obama’s BC is non-valid. So Onaka’s got a mess on his hands.