ATO would be Alvin T Onaka. That’s the one on the MDEC verification, IIRC.
The MDEC verification is probably the closest we’ll come to a standard certified verification, but the request was never made on a standard verification application form so the content on it is totally different than a response to a standard verification application.
I think what’s going on here is that there are 2 different BC’s for Obama. The only way they could claim that 151-61-10641 was on a record for Obama is if he was given somebody else’s BC#, according to the 2 mutually-exclusive numbering methods described by past or present HDOH officials as having been in use then. And the only place where they are authorized to create a new BC with a different BC# is in HRS 338-17.7, where they are allowed to make a new BC saying whatever law enforcement tells them to put on it, in order to protect the registrant.
But that procedure is only allowed if the registrant was born in Hawaii (which can’t be known from Obama’s original non-valid record), and it doesn’t give them the right to steal somebody else’s BC# (who would then have to be assigned a different number even though they were not in danger and there was therefore no lawful authorization for their number to be changed).
So that 2nd BC that was created, under the guise of protecting Obama from us “violent birthers”, is not lawful, since Obama’s BC is non-valid. So Onaka’s got a mess on his hands.
“ATO would be Alvin T Onaka.”
Ahhh...of course. Duh.
Well that makes sense then. The only letter that doesn’t get into specific details (like the BC#) is the only one personally signed and embossed by Onaka.