Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

What I meant was that the SoS and AG don’t agree with the legal argument that the verification is legally worthless.

It appears to me that they are accepting the verification at face value as proof Obama was born in Hawaii. For them and eligiblity purposes that is all that matters as Kobash said during the hearing he didn’t buy the two citizen parent theory.


64 posted on 09/22/2012 3:20:03 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

Nowhere on that verification did Onaka say that the record was legally-valid, and nowhere did he say that any of the claimed facts were true. There is no way that the verification received by ANY of these people (Bennett, MDEC, or Kobach) can prove that there is legal evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug 4, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. For all we know from what Onaka has disclosed, the record that the WH BC information “matches” could be written on toilet paper in crayon 45 years after the birth.

And for it to be legally non-valid even in Hawaii with its loopholes, it would actually have to be something pretty similar to that...


66 posted on 09/22/2012 4:59:59 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson