Nowhere on that verification did Onaka say that the record was legally-valid, and nowhere did he say that any of the claimed facts were true. There is no way that the verification received by ANY of these people (Bennett, MDEC, or Kobach) can prove that there is legal evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug 4, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. For all we know from what Onaka has disclosed, the record that the WH BC information “matches” could be written on toilet paper in crayon 45 years after the birth.
And for it to be legally non-valid even in Hawaii with its loopholes, it would actually have to be something pretty similar to that...
“There is no way that the verification received by ANY of these people (Bennett, MDEC, or Kobach) can prove that there is legal evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu “
How do you explain that he settled for a verification that is word for word the same as the one sent to the MDEC (except for item 2 which the MDEC did not ask to be verified), if he knew that the MDEC’s was worthless? Why did he not only certify Obama for the ballot but also came out and made strong statements to the press that the matter was settled and Obama was eligible?
To me that only means one of two things:
1) Kobash knew he could be charged with perjury and election fraud and said screw it.
or,
2) He thinks Klayman’s letter is wrong in its legal argument and he can not be charged with a crime. And if he doesn’t accept Klayman’s arguments then to him the BC is legally valid per the verifications.
Is there a third option?