Posted on 09/17/2012 5:17:59 PM PDT by grundle
IQ estimates by intended college major via SAT scores
Assuming the mean IQ of SAT test-takers included in a report by the College Board to be 103*, the estimated average IQ of students by intended college major follow. The estimates exclude writing results, which were added in 2005 and constitute what is generally considered the least objectively reliable part of the test**. The critical reading and mathematics (previously known as the quantitative section) portions are equally weighted:
Intended major IQ
Interdisciplinary studies 114.0
Physical sciences 111.2
Mathematics and statistics 110.7
English and literature 110.1
Foreign language 109.8
Philosophy and religious studies 109.6
Social sciences 109.3
Library science 108.7
Engineering 108.5
Biological and biomedical sciences 107.7
Liberal arts & sciences and humanities 107.5
Area, ethnic, cultural, gender studies 106.8
Theology and religious vocations 106.4
Undecided 106.2
History 106.0
Natural resources and conservation 104.6
Military sciences 104.1
Computer and information sciences 103.9
Communication and journalism 103.5
Architecture 103.2
Visual and performing arts 103.0
Legal professions 102.8
Psychology 101.3
Business 101.2
Health professions 100.8
Engineering technicians 99.9
Education 99.3
Agriculture 99.2
Transportation 98.7
Other 97.8
Family and consumer sciences 97.5
Parks, recreation, leisure and fitness 97.5
Public administration and social services 96.6
Culinary services 96.5
Security and protection 95.9
Precision production 95.2
Construction trades 94.3
Mechanic and repair technician 93.3
/johnny
Philosophy and religious studies
Social sciences
Library science
These are no physics majors.
There's a company in Silicon Valley whose declared mission is "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful" (google the phrase if you're wondering which). I wonder how many library science majors have managed to get jobs there.
No, but philosophy and English (and French) literature majors have traditionally been on average quite smart. I really don’t know about library science, so I’ll believe their data. As someone else pointed out, none of these averages are especially high.
My point re: the physics anecdote was that engineering majors, while smart enough to do the work aren’t necessarily all that smart. And again, these are the majors to which high school students aspire—lots of those hoping to become engineers won’t make it.
No way engineering majors have an average IQ of only 111.
Bad base presumption, that the average IQ of SAT takes is only 103. The unintelligent don’t go to competitive colleges that require SATs. 1 in 4 Americans don’t graduate HS at all, and only half that do take the SATs.
Engineers certainly are a long way from stupid, but being notably bright isn’t necessarily the case, either. Dogged determination, more discipline than the norm, a degree of monomaniacal focus and better than average memory and spatio-visualization skills serve them better than raw IQ. Those end up being the physics majors.
Can't be right. I've had (2) IQ tests, and don't want to brag, but they came out dozens above that.
Have you looked at the demographics of our current high school students? I bet they don’t average more than 95 overall.
Tesla was an ethnic Serb from Croatia. There is a street named for him in downtown Zagreb, the capital of Croatia.
Ha ha. Seems the only ones posting their IQ scores here have some sort of prideful motivation.
Once again, these aren’t averages for engineers, only for high school students taking the SAT who are planning to major in engineering.
There are plenty of those books.
Leo Szilard?
Physics are subsumed under “physical science”. Physics was my intended major.
Do you know the context of that picture? I had that picture in my Chemistry book decades ago. The caption simply said that the conference they were at was considered the greatest grouping of sheer genius in the history of mankind (and womankind, if you look two to the left of Einstein - GO MADAM!!!).
Which one of the group had the distinction of having won two Nobel prizes in two distinct fields of science? (Hint: the individual's chromosomal makeup also differed from that of the others.)
I am not sure. That doesn’t sound right but at this point I probably would say the same thing if someone mentioned the correct name to me.
Oppenheimer said of Szilard that, if the Bomb could have been built on ideas alone, Leo could have built it all by himself.
"Neutrons and Neutrinos Conference? Down the hall, make a left, it's just past the water fountain.".... "No problem, these crazy conferences always get confused..."
:)
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.