Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocker: Ron Paul’s Delegate Strategy Does NOT Steal Him the GOP Nomination
Moore Common Sense ^ | 8/31/12 | Alan

Posted on 08/31/2012 12:02:37 PM PDT by alan8228

This is a major reason why I despise Ron Paul. He convinced donors to give him money based on this cockamamie and evolving strategy of getting delegates to the RNC convention. And what did they get out of it? Zippo. And the worst part is Paul knew all along it wouldn't work.

First, Paul tried to convince people he knew the delegate process better than Mitt Romney and could successfully get enough delegates to steal the nomination. People gave him money in droves. Next, he changed the strategy so his delegates could influence the party platform as if that had any effect on real policy. People then gave him more money in droves. Following that the rumor was he was working a deal to either get Rand Paul on the ticket or a prime speaking role at the convention. People continued to donate their hard earned cash. None of the aforementioned stated goals ever came to fruition. In fact if you actually believed any of those goals then I've got a bridge to sell you. Now the talking point is he is trying to lay the foundation to change the Republican Party in the coming years to a more libertarian philosophy.

In other words, there is no clear goal. He has found away to keep the wallets of his supporters open for an indeterminate amount of time. He can keep peddling this notion of transforming the GOP until he thinks of some other way to get your money. And people will keep writing checks. This frustrates me to no end because I hate seeing so many people get taken advantage.

If you think I'm wrong then answer this one question. If you can't answer it off the top of your head then you've been hoodwinked: What is Ron Paul's single greatest legislative accomplishment? How about his top 3? He's been in and out of office since 1976. You'd think he'd accomplish something, right? If you did then you'd be wrong:

Of the 620 measures that Paul has sponsored, just four have made it to a vote on the House floor. Only that one has been signed into law.

House colleagues say the genial Paul has often shown little interest in the laborious one-on-one lobbying required to build a coalition behind his ideas. This year, for instance, Paul has sponsored 47 bills, including measures to withdraw from the United Nations, repeal the federal law banning guns in school zones and let private groups coin their own money.

None has moved, and 32 have failed to attract a single co-sponsor.


He's a congressman. It's his job to get legislation passed. He has a lifetime achievement of 0.2%. How exactly would he be an effective president? He can't even do his current job effectively and he's been trying since the 70's. If hell froze over and he became the chief executive then what could we expect? More talk? Crazy chatter? No one would follow him because he's not a leader. He's a campaigner in futility.

Here is the reality of the situation. If you donated to Ron Paul because you believed in his message then you might be able to pat yourself on the back. Although I don't agree with it since there isn't really a clear direction and it seems to shift depending on Paul's rant of the day, he still got to espouse it in debates and through the added attention of the campaign spotlight. If you donated to him because you thought he could become president then you were seriously ripped off. He is stringing people along for his own gain, and that's just wrong. He knew he would never win the presidency and has gone on the record saying he never wanted to win in the first place. Running a message campaign has its limits. There have to be clear goals and Ron Paul didn't meet any of them.

My prediction is he will follow the path of the Pat Buchanan people and fade into obscurity. With Paul out of office and if he never runs for president again then he will cease to be relevant. In 4 years I believe him and his followers will be a distant memory. Rand Paul has potential but does not carry the cult of personality of his father. The Paulites are already upset with him for endorsing Mitt Romney so you have to believe he won't get the same type of following.

Read more at Moore Common Sense.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: ronpaul; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2012 12:02:39 PM PDT by alan8228
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alan8228

Now Uncle Crazy can just fade away or join so “truther” group somewhere either way we don’t have to listen to him anymore.


2 posted on 08/31/2012 12:06:05 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

This was akin to pitching a penny stock. Anyone remotely rational knew it was a long shot.


3 posted on 08/31/2012 12:08:43 PM PDT by kenavi (Obama doesn't hate private equity. He wants to be it with our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

This was akin to pitching a penny stock. Anyone remotely rational knew it was a long shot.


4 posted on 08/31/2012 12:11:44 PM PDT by kenavi (Obama doesn't hate private equity. He wants to be it with our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

It did, however, cause a lot of chaos and cause the “e” to make a poor reaction in regards to rule changes.

It actually hurt Santorum the most.


5 posted on 08/31/2012 12:14:34 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

The point was to deny Romney the nomination and force a contested Convention.

It was a long shot.


6 posted on 08/31/2012 12:16:41 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Santo was out at that point.
Pauls strategy actually left the door open for Santo.

It was Rience Priebus that slammed the door.


7 posted on 08/31/2012 12:18:20 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

We will see how it all pans out for us. You must remember that if Mitt and Obama were running under any moniker other than the republican and democrat they couldn’t get elected as an animal control officer.

Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - Douglas Adams


8 posted on 08/31/2012 12:23:07 PM PDT by anchorclankor (From the main part of Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

I understand where you are coming from.

But...

Someone (Walter Williams?) once said, we would be better off if we paid all 535 congress critters a million dollars a year. The condition of the deal would be they did nothing at all.

When do we say enough laws already?


9 posted on 08/31/2012 12:24:35 PM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228
He's a congressman. It's his job to get legislation passed. He has a lifetime achievement of 0.2%. How exactly would he be an effective president? He can't even do his current job effectively and he's been trying since the 70's.

I'm not a Paul fan, but I disagree with this measure of success. If Paul had not managed to pass any legislation at all but had succeeded in stopping TARP, Bailout, Stimulus, Cash-for-Clunkers, ObamaCare, or any of the other terrible and shockingly wasteful federal bills from passing, I would consider Paul a congressional success and a great man. With someone like him, whose goal is limited government, to measure success by the expansion of government is absurd. The problem with Paul is that he failed to prevent so many horrible laws from passing. I'd like to see him form more alliances to stop the terrible bills that "successful" Congresscritters push through.

10 posted on 08/31/2012 12:25:11 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

Funny that there was no mention that there were enough members of the rules committee to require a floor vote, which would have given the Paul delegates a chance to act; but the bus driver for the Virginia delegation “got lost”, and drove them hither and yon while the rules committee was meeting, so the committee voted without them and adjourned.

In other words, a rotten, low-down, political dirty trick has now marginalized current and future delegates to the RNC, so that only the monied interests will now select who the candidates will be in the future.

Ironically, a similar dirty trick was used in the Soviet Union to make Nikita Khrushchev the General Party Secretary.

But because the Republican leadership pulled this dirty trick off and won, both the Republican grassroots and conservatives are marginalized in the future.

So celebrate! The Ron Paul you so despise has lost.

And so have we all.

Karl Rove, and people like him, Beltway Bandits and lobbyists, now control the Republican party.


11 posted on 08/31/2012 12:45:47 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

If people want to give their hard-earned cash to a worthless snakeoil salesman, there is not a lot we can do to stop them. The problem is that no-one seems to feel it’s worth the effort to factcheck his blatherings. It’s a totally thankless job to be sure, but there are some principles a person should stand on, like the concept of actually having principles ;)


12 posted on 08/31/2012 12:50:46 PM PDT by BlackAdderess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alan8228

The only difference between Ron Paul and Alan Keyes is that Paul actually runs for an office he can win-—which he uses as his means to legitimize his other “campaigns”-—while Keyes always “runs” for offices he has no chance ever of winning. Love to see Paul try his schtick out running for a senate seat in TX and see where that gets him.


13 posted on 08/31/2012 1:29:44 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

The GOP has done serious damage to themselves and is too stupid to know it. I and a whole lot of other non Paul supporters like Limbaugh, Levin, Savage, Palin and Malkin aren’t buying the lie.

The GOP has become as dangerously deranged as the democrats and justice won’t be pretty.


14 posted on 08/31/2012 1:30:27 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: alan8228
He's a congressman. It's his job to get legislation passed.

No it's not. It's to represent your district in the manner you promised to when you ran. If you the promise to try to change the establishment and they don't go along, you can hardly be blamed for that.

15 posted on 08/31/2012 1:50:08 PM PDT by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

Where are all the FReepers who said Romney wasn’t going to get the nomination (even after the primaries were over)?

Are they out drinking with the ones who said Baraq & Biden wouldn’t be on the D ticket?


16 posted on 08/31/2012 1:52:18 PM PDT by nascarnation (Defeat Baraq 2012. Deport Baraq 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Oddly enough, I would call it almost a mirror image of what happened to the Democrats in 1968 and 1972.

In their case, in 1968 their parties radical wing tried to take the party by storm and were met with force and crushed, with the Democrats losing to Nixon. But by 1972 the radicals were strong enough to take the convention and displace the old guard. And the radicals have controlled the Democrats ever since.

However, in this case, the Tea Party has been slowly and methodically taking out the RINOs and liberals who control the party. So this year is possibly their last convention in control. They have won this battle, but whether or not Romney wins, by 2016, if the Tea Party keeps it up, the old guard will be overthrown, and conservatives will control the party.

And once the RINOs and liberals are overthrown, that will be their political end for a very long time. People like Karl Rove will be out on the street, stripped of power and influence.


17 posted on 08/31/2012 4:00:14 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Just don’t underestimate the lengths they’ll go to in order to hang onto power. Just look around FR at how many have gone full Alinsky in an effort to destroy opposition to their masters.

These people have no problem with a gestapo as long as the target is right.


18 posted on 08/31/2012 4:14:29 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Of all the things Ron Paul has NOT managed to do, passing a bunch of new laws is by far my favorite.


19 posted on 08/31/2012 4:43:29 PM PDT by 2big2fail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=77W5OKStO5s


20 posted on 08/31/2012 6:48:07 PM PDT by freedommom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson