Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bushwon
Scalia and Kennedy will retire during Republican administrations because they were appointed by Republicans and the history of the Court proves that fact to be generally true.

I look at the Justices he appointed in Massachusetts..75% of which we liberal.

I think Levin is wrong. I'll do what I think is right I am sure Mark will do likewise

57 posted on 08/30/2012 10:41:26 PM PDT by montanajoe (Blame Flame Shame or Beg I won't vote for R/R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: montanajoe

History of court, generally true?


You say they “will be retiring” then you use the term “generally?” Hmmm not exactly quantitative or guaranteed...so, at best, you are making assumptions based on behaviors of past judges. Not sure you can make such assumptions based on past behaviors. Heck, look at what Roberts did this spring regarding obamacare!!!!

Not sure of your historical assumptions...it is now past one a.m. and perhaps over weekend i will attempt look at past judge retirements.

However, I do really respect the experience, intellect and knowledge base of Levin and am going to follow his lead. Romney is not perfect in any way shape or form, and if he wins, I suspect, I will be a prolific poster railing on many of his decisions.

However, I don’t think Romney is anti-USA...Clue: Have you seen 2016? If not, would highly recommend it. After you see it, you may decide that there is indeed a difference in world views between Romney and the current administration.

You do what you think is right; so will I. I don’t believe that this country will survive as we know it with 4 more years of this progressive experiment. Like it or not, Romney is the only man on the planet who might be able to unseat the current administration. In good conscience, I cannot ignore that fact.


59 posted on 08/30/2012 11:04:51 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe

To be fair and objective one must understand the politics of his court appointments. They had to be approved by an overwhelmingly liberal legislature.

Romney was never going to win that fight and stack the state courts with conservatives. That was an impossible task that would have come with a very heavy political price.

I am tired of this argument repeatedly being posted here on FR. It is a narrow argument that ignores reality. An appropriate analogy would be criticizing the QB for his passer rating during a game played in a monsoon. Peyton Manning on his best day could not pass effectively in those conditions.

It’s time to get over the temper tantrum and face reality.


60 posted on 08/30/2012 11:06:30 PM PDT by volunbeer (Don't worry America, our kids will pay for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe
I look at the Justices he appointed in Massachusetts..75% of which we liberal.

100% of them were liberals, only 25% of them were republicans.

64 posted on 08/30/2012 11:42:20 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson