Posted on 08/22/2012 5:07:23 AM PDT by Travis McGee
Our military planners are openly discussing how to kill "Tea Party extremists" who have taken over a small town in the USA. Is this "operational lay-down" merely a "cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario," as described by The Washington Times, or is it something much more malevolent?
The military scenario appears in the July 25, 2012 issue of the respected Small Wars Journal and posits that, while Obama will be thrown out of office in 2012, ten years of race- and immigrant-bashing by "right-wing demagogues" will have whipped white Americans into gang-like attacks on non-whites.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/wargaming_termination_of_tea_party_extremists.html#ixzz24HANT56n
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Given actual news events, rather than bigoted speculation, maybe they should be preparing to handle a big-city take-over by violent mobs of minorities.
Because small militias of minorities are already committing violent acts throughout our cities, pretty much on a daily basis, and getting more brazen about it all the time.
Flashmobbing, the new way to train the dead-soul yutes to come when called to be cattle, to act as cannon fodder. The brilliant stroke is that even if these programmed fools are shown how they are being set up —to provide the blood progressives need to stop the Republic from functioning— they’re too stupid by design to comprehend the meaning!
UK Airforce participated with one or two special planes built for handling insurgencies/insurgents like the ones faced in Ireland. The planes had special rec ecuipment not seen on US planes at the time.
Together with the planes, the US also borrowed the personnel and pilots to fly them.
Anyway, I have hours of footage that I’m technically not supposed to have, going into painful detail of the whole thing, including the planes and the machinegunning of people trying to escape the flames. I’ll actually check with the source and see if I can get a green light to just put them up on our site.
Oh, and a good friend of mine (although she is a liberal), a religion professor from California, told me she knew Koresh. And that the official version was completely bogus.
Your Post #24 would be an example of one of several small “skirmishes” that I referred to.
The next Civil War, Revolution, etc. will not be an all out organized war (IMO). As soon as it started to look like war, I believe MOST or our soldiers and LEO would not kill citizens (armed or otherwise) to take geographical control of objectives (battle plans).
If soldiers were told to defend against “home grown insurgents,” they might defend themselves violently. But I cannot envision a scenario where a state, or the citizens thereof, in the midst of sessession pursuit would attack a target that needed National Guard defense. I believe the winning tactic would be to ignore and disregard the FED fiscally and regulatorily and defend your citizens from federal enforcement.
Again, this is only my opinion. And I do acknowldedge there would be some violence that broke out between the most well intended citizens and soldiers that were both only doing what they were ordered or believed in.
Once invasion and battle plans started being drawn up, the violent quelling of the insurrection would find the press and soldiers would have to decide if they are citizens first or soldiers first. Seeing how many of our soldiers today value freedom and individual liberty over a leftist socialist state, I think most would do the right thing.
Nicely put. On occasion big words and legalese can be useful.
In short, the most patriotic Americans (mostly conservatives) won't be moved to violently overthrow a legally elected (legitimate) government of the United States. The Federal Government would have to first be delegitimized and unconstitutional (recognized by significant if not majority of citizens).
Certain events ordered by government could solidify the recognition. But they would have to be egregious and made public with grandiose propaganda (more akin to the Revolutionary War).
Google can be your friend search The Bonus Army of 1932 & what happened to them when you state without doubt that American soldiers won’t shoot American civilians.
That was fairly evident in "Waco: Rules of Engagement".
Ping.
Yeah, you know, Herbert Walker and Billy were boss and underboss in an early criminal organization focussing mostly on drugrunning and gambling. In which they used large parts of the CIA for their own ends.
That scenario wouldn’t require any war gaming though.
“Yeah, you know, Herbert Walker and Billy were boss and underboss in an early criminal organization focussing mostly on drugrunning and gambling. In which they used large parts of the CIA for their own ends.”
No, but they were collaborators in drugrunning and gunrunning based out of Mena airport, and each as president presided over the increased militarization of federal law enforcement, and each administration had watch over acts of state terror against inoffensive citizens at Ruby Ridge and Waco.
“Seeing how many of our soldiers today value freedom and individual liberty over a leftist socialist state, I think most would do the right thing.”
Assuming they are even here, and not marooned on some patch of rock which has been arbitrarily designated as ‘vital’ to American interests.
The wetwork here would be attempted by corrupted fed law enforcement and hastily equipped ‘domestic security forces’ whatever they would be called.
Lol. You might want to confer with Chip Tatum on that one.
Oh, I ferget. He was found tortured to death not so long ago.
The authors have really done a marvelous service. By expsing their thinking and how to deal with it, doing the EXACT OPPOSITE will leave them with no contingency.
Stay tuned for my next essay.
“White House Insider” aka “Ulsterman” et al is total BS and beneath contempt. It is a low trick to write fiction, then attempt to ramp up its horsepower, by claiming it’s reality.
Of course, the memes this lying FICTION writer writes are often close to reality, probably. That’s why they resonated.
But only a low down scumbag writes FICTION and calls it FACT to get traction for his own ideas.
“Google can be your friend search The Bonus Army of 1932 & what happened to them when you state without doubt that American soldiers wont shoot American civilians.”
That wasn’t my statement, but Rapscallion’s statement to which I was responding. I know what happened to the Bonus Army of 1932. I don’t use Google and reading more carefully can be your friend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.