Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 08/11/2012 7:23:09 AM PDT by marktwain
This is what those who would appease the anti-freedom forces need to remember: It does not matter how safe or how law abiding you are. They want you disarmed. It has never been about crime or safety. It has always been about control.
Correct but next the anti-selfdefense cult will tell us that registration works. Everyone of those guns is well traceable.
O’Reilly = O’Blowhard
Check into who committed those murders with the machine guns. You’ll find that at least one of them was a cop.
—bingo—exactly-—
With friends like bilbo who needs enemas? ;-)
And their attempts to disarm Americans will be met with a Lexington & Concord response.
Yes, that’s about right. Which is why the right to self defense is a lost cause.
Quite correct.
0’Reilly is a dunce.
I hope everyone contacts O’reilly and tell him to put his money where his mouth is on this one!
But there are those on this forum that love, adore, and worship him.
Didn’t see the show (usually change channels) but O’Really probably thinks an AR is ‘a machine gun’.
I’d bet I can go out and purchase a machine gun withing 24 hours without discussing a thing with the gub mint.
But then I know some boys that???
The anti gun crowd, especially the anti “assault” weapon crowd always comes up the notion that it should be unlawful for anyone but the military to have such weapons. They obviously either are ignorant or don’t care to know that the 2nd amendment, following right behind the first, underpins the first’s guarantee of freedom from government interference speech, religion and assembly. Now why is that so? Simple, because the colonists in 1775 were almost equally armed as were the British soldiers when it came to small arms. Furthermore, the original government did not want a standing army to defend the country, forget maintaining safety at home, the role of the military was to defend the country from foreign attack, not some thief. While it sounds hokey, the simple fact is, the right to keep arms is there to keep the government and its military under control. It is the only thing between the populace here and tyranny IMO albeit it keeps getting eroded.
Some clown here recently wrote in a letter to editor and his question was “why does one need an assault weapon to hunt game with” The answer is, it is not just to hunt game but to enable you the future right to have published just such an assinine question.
with apologies to Ted Knight
Find O'Reilly
.
A small minority I suppose.
I think you mispelled Bilbo.
It should read Dildo.
That's too easy! 0'Reilly has dark hair. He's in the 3rd pic on top with his arm around Ted Knight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.