Posted on 08/06/2012 10:50:09 AM PDT by scottjewell
I posted a LOT of comments on that article, all still awaiting approval, of course...
Right! And this was from someone who is NOT anti-gay marriage! Even their own supporters are fed up.
Let me know if/when they publish - would love to see them.
In their wishful thinking, they see their position as mainstream. When reality rears its ugly head in the form of public voting, polls, or a CFA show of support; they are disoriented and cannot reconcile the results with their outcome predictions. Their bewilderment and confusion makes it that much funnier to me.
Will do.
Maybe he's changed over the years. I don't know.
Gays do not realize that they are nothing more than a pawn in Democrat victimization politics.
Note to gays, no one is going to take you seriously as long as people associate being gay with San Francisco freak show parades and your need to let everyone know what kind of sex you have.
Yes, Signorile was originally very doubtful about gay marriage. But then he figured out that it might be the perfect Trojan horse:
“Michelangelo Signorile admits that is his strategy as a homosexual activist.
His goal isnt to get government-backed same-sex marriage so he can adhere to marriages moral code like straights do. (He can already do that without the government getting involved. And remember, just about every other homosexual is like Signorile96 percent of them do not get married when giver the chance.)
His goal is to destroy marriage itself. He urges his fellow homosexual activists:
to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, demand the right to marry, not as a way of adhering to societys moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.
He goes on to write, The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake is to transform the notion of family entirely. [4]”
http://standingfast.tumblr.com/post/23940135233/but-none-of-those-involve-you-consenting-adults
“Gay Voices is asking if the CFA gay protest failed, why, and what can be done now?”
1- Yes, it failed.
2- Cuz nobody wanted to watch your public vulgarity.
3- You can go back into the closet and quit insisting that the rest of the world endorse and promote your lifestyle, as we are under no obligation to make our children available to predators.
What some of them dont understand or wont admit is that the goal is criminalization of Christianity, not rights
The silly oafs don’t realize they are bringing on their own demise. If Christianity falls, what will stop anyone from deciding that the LGBT community needs to be next. In their own stupidity they are destroying many of the freedoms that allow their own groups to exist.
They wanted their same sex marriage issue to be viewed as more important. And it really wasnt, not even to their own allies.
Not even to their own community. I heard several friends relay to me that there were gay folks in line at chick-fil-a because they saw it as a 1st ammendment issue.
As Sherlock Holmes would say, this is a needle indicating an earthquake.
Note to totalitarian fags: Run.
Note to Constitutional homosexuals: When they run, trip them, load them into garbage cans, and roll them down a hill into a dump, where they belong.
Hard to believe this moment has actually arrived....
Math cannot be defied, no matter how much hate you have.
That is unnecessary on a site that has kids reading and posting on it. Maybe you are one of them.
His strategy is working apparently.
“Large differences by race and Hispanic origin exist in the share of births to unmarried women, with non-Hispanic white women and Asian or Pacific Islander women being much less likely to have a —> nonmarital birth.
In 2010, 73 percent of all births to black non-Hispanic women, 66 percent of births of American Indian or Alaskan native women, and 53 percent of births to Hispanic women occurred outside of marriage, compared with 29 percent for white non-Hispanic women and 17 percent for Asian or Pacific Islander women.”
In 2010, more than four in ten births (41 percent) were to unmarried women. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/?q=node/196
,,,, what to do . . . .
K M A ,,,,,,
Exactly - and I think this is beginnig to slowly dawn on them.
No doubt he would like to see these numbers increase, if only to “transform an archaic institution”. To hell with the children, let’s just focus on freedom for adults...
Mike, you had the press and a not inconsiderable portion of the larger society on your side. And I guarantee that anybody who was exercised enough about this to want to go out and neck at a Chick-fil-A had access to when and where to go. There were just a lot more people who supported CFA, supported Dan Cathy, or at least the right to his opinion, wanted to give more than lip service to that, and incidentally thought a chicken sandwich, waffle fries and a peach shake sounded pretty darned tasty. And let’s be honest. The reason the left never really pulled the narrative back after Menino and Emanuel popped off is because they agree with what Menino and Emanuel originally wanted to do. Their only problem with what Tom and Rahm said is that Tom and Rahm were stupid enough to say it out loud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.