Yes, Signorile was originally very doubtful about gay marriage. But then he figured out that it might be the perfect Trojan horse:
“Michelangelo Signorile admits that is his strategy as a homosexual activist.
His goal isn’t to get government-backed same-sex marriage so he can adhere to marriage’s moral code like straights do. (He can already do that without the government getting involved. And remember, just about every other homosexual is like Signorile—96 percent of them do not get married when giver the chance.)
His goal is to destroy marriage itself. He urges his fellow homosexual activists:
“to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, demand the right to marry, not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.”
He goes on to write, “The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake… is to transform the notion of ‘family’ entirely.” [4]”
http://standingfast.tumblr.com/post/23940135233/but-none-of-those-involve-you-consenting-adults
His strategy is working apparently.
“Large differences by race and Hispanic origin exist in the share of births to unmarried women, with non-Hispanic white women and Asian or Pacific Islander women being much less likely to have a —> nonmarital birth.
In 2010, 73 percent of all births to black non-Hispanic women, 66 percent of births of American Indian or Alaskan native women, and 53 percent of births to Hispanic women occurred outside of marriage, compared with 29 percent for white non-Hispanic women and 17 percent for Asian or Pacific Islander women.”
In 2010, more than four in ten births (41 percent) were to unmarried women. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/?q=node/196