Any Vote That Isn't For Romney Is Effectively A Vote For Obama (pic)

The Looking Spoon ^ | The Looking Spoon

[The Looking Spoon]

I know Romney's not a hit with Freepers. Truth be told he was FAR from my first pick as well. BUT...

Created for OMG! for America. Join the grassroots there, or just join the fun at the Facebook page here

[muawiyah]

you have it in your power to negate the entire transaction you imagine ~ just convince a BHO voter to vote for your boy.

That's right ~ go convert a mind ~ if you don't, you are casting another vote for BHO

[Windflier]

Abortion mandating, gay ‘marriage’ imposing, GloBull Warming advocating, gun grabbing, liberal judge appointing, tax raising, Obamacare birthing, liberal, statist Romney, will never get my vote.

I refuse to bullied, coerced, shamed, arm-twisted, or hollered, into throwing my personal integrity into the toilet for this spineless fraud.

[Finny]

Ah. I see -- when your candidate loses, it's because the folks who refused to vote for him "voted for the other guy even though they didn't but it was just the same as if they did because the other guy won and he would have LOST if only the folks who didn't vote or who voted for a third party had voted for my guy!"

If Romney loses, it won't be because a bunch of conservatives "voted for Obama." It will be because Romney failed to net enough votes to win.

Distortions and emotional rationalizations to the contrary, mathematically and materially there's only ONE WAY for a conservative or any other American to vote for Obama, and that's to mark Obama's name on the ballot.

There's only ONE WAY for a Democrat, an Independent, or any other American to vote for Romney, and that's to mark Romney's name on the ballot.

There's only ONE WAY for any American to vote for government tyranny, and that's to mark the name of a liberal statist on the ballot.

A vote for either Romney or Obama is a vote for government tyranny. A third party vote, whether it is cast by an Environmentalist Wacko Pinhead, an angry Libertarian, a high-minded Independent, a disillusioned Democrat, or a conservative like me who refuses to participate in this charade of Obama vs Obama lite, favors neither Romney nor Obama. However, every single third party vote will work toward denying a popular mandate for whichever bastard wins.

Considering that the bastard is guaranteed to be an authoritarian statist either way, having to be on the defensive facing enemies within his own party as well as the opposing one, all supported in their opposition to him because the majoritiy of Americans were on record as rejecting him at the ballot box, would be a good thing.

Pray for a plurality. Vote for plurality.

[Norm Lenhart]

Yup/. And not one ABO can answer it honestly and retain their ABO stance. Thus they ignore the issue, call names or just duck it.

They are no more conservative when the rubber hits the road than Bill Ayres. Their actions, and logical deduction prove that.

[APatientMan]

If you are here calling out for votes for Romney you are a Mittbot, in my book. No apologies for that.

I did not mean to say you needed an a$$ kicking. I meant that a liberal calling himself a Conservative deserves one. By that I mean Mittens.

I should have worded that post to be more clear.

[svcw]

No and No
There is a big difference in protocol and BOWING.
Come on E, get real.

[1035rep]

Some people are really scared of what the Kenyan might do next, I know I am. I think we all want the same thing but have a different opinion on how to get there. I think if the Kenyan followed the rules it might make a difference but with all Czars, executive orders and Eric Holder we don’t stand a chance if he gets 4 more years.

He told Putin to wait until after the election when he has more flexibility. Flexibility to do what? The Kenyan scares the hell out of me.

[Finny]

Nothing says “Dem win” like a Clintonian plurality

And nothing says "Republican Revolution" like a Clintonian plurality. Or have you forgotten 1994?

[Girlene]

You just proved it is true for you. You made an excuse why it’s ‘ok’ for you to vote for a liberal. That is in no way conservative.

Disagree. It's called common sense. obama is and will continue to destroy this great country. He must be stopped. He cannot be stopped unless he is voted out. How do you do that? Vote for the other guy.

You are saying a vote for a liberal is not conservative. I could just as easily say allowing obama to continue destroying this country is not conservative.

The founders understood common sense. They used it in writing the Declaration of Independence. What if certain ones had stood on their principles against slavery? Where would we be? They decided to fix that later......and this country paid a heavy price. But we had a country.

[Windflier]

I’m befuddled.

Stop lying. You're pimping the most radically liberal candidate the GOP has ever foisted on the nation, and you know it.

[EternalVigilance]

I learned quite a long time ago that if the words don’t line up with the actions, always believe the actions.

[IrishPennant]

Thanks brother...although I cannot say it much on FR without being called a useless dog shooter, I highly, uh, “empathized” after my days in the Corps with those spoken of on your FR Home Page. God Bless!

[Hegewisch Dupa]

thank you - only half-wits think fear is unreasonable in this case. These same morons, one would suppose, would have no fear if they gave a suicidal drunken Ray Charles keys to a Maserati and then rode shotgun. It amazes me they even have enough brain cells to post.

[EternalVigilance]

The founders understood common sense. They used it in writing the Declaration of Independence.

Mitt Romney's record, and his stances to this day, are one hundred and eighty degrees out of phase with the principles of the Declaration of Independence.

[Norm Lenhart]

Congress/the House has every tool needed to stop Obama cold. They have had GOP leadership since 2010. The fault of every crime unpunished/unthwarted since then is the responsibility of the GOP.

If they will not stop a supposed enemy, they are even less likely to hold back one of their own.

4-8 years of either scares the hell out of me and I refuse to elect my own fear. I refuse to let fear rule me and overrule everything I know to be right. If Utopia burns, I will not be responsible for lighting the match.

[Finny]

I’m befuddled.

You can say that again! *ducking*

[EternalVigilance]

Time to dust off this old tagline ...

[JRandomFreeper]

The Kenyan scares the hell out of me.

Your fear in no way obligates me to vote against my concience.

Sorry you are scared. I know it can be debilitating. There are treatments for that.

/johnny

[Norm Lenhart]

Common sense is absent in your reply. The FF chose to stand on principle and defy the king. They did not accept the lesser evil. Look it up.

[Windflier]

If you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, think again!

I guess you didn't bother to review Romney's judicial picks while he was Governor of Massachusetts before you posted that breathless bit of drama.

Romney's judicial picks made the Massachusetts left smile with glee. What makes you think that leopard has changed his spots? Because he told you so?

Good luck with that Hope & Change.