Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Historic First For Obama & Pals…Holder Held In Contempt
Flopping Aces ^ | 06-28-12 | Curt

Posted on 06/28/2012 8:39:24 PM PDT by Starman417

ABC News spent all of 30 seconds on the first cabinet member to ever be held in contempt:

[VIDEO AT SITE]

Shocking right? I mean the there is no MSM bias right?

Imagine if this had happened during Bush's tenure....the media ran non-stop stories about the desk jockey at the CIA getting outed but the Attorney General of the United States being held in criminal and civil contempt? Yawn.

Pathetic.

The House of Representatives voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress Thursday for failing to provide documents relating to the Fast and Furious gunwalking program.

The House took two votes, one on criminal contempt charges, which passed 255-67. The criminal contempt of Congress is likely not to go anywhere as the Justice Department, which Holder heads, is the department responsible for opening a criminal investigation.

The second charge, which passed 258 – 95, was a civil contempt charge, could move to federal court where it could take years to litigate. Though the action puts more pressure on the administration to abide by the subpoenas and provide requested documents.

Meanwhile, meet the 17 Democrats who voted with Republicans:

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; murdergate; obama

1 posted on 06/28/2012 8:39:30 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Romneys counselors are being studious and circumspect.

You all should now I’m a Palinista.

But, Ive been impressed so far at how they’ve handled stuff; aggressive but not offensive.

Witholder is a special high-value target who obama chose to chain himself to.

A lot of hay can be made here if played right...


2 posted on 06/28/2012 8:48:30 PM PDT by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Romneys counselors are being studious and circumspect.

You all should know I’m a Palinista.

But, Ive been impressed so far at how they’ve handled stuff; aggressive but not offensive.

Witholder is a special high-value target who obama chose to chain himself to.

A lot of hay can be made here if played right...


3 posted on 06/28/2012 8:48:51 PM PDT by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

And thie OJ Juror wannabes in the Professional Black Racists threw a tantrum and walked out on history. I guess because Jaime Zapata was a “white Hispanic” and Brian Terry was just another white boy to them. Damn commie pigs! I hate those bottom feeding bass turds.


4 posted on 06/28/2012 8:57:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
The criminal contempt of Congress is likely not to go anywhere as the Justice Department, which Holder heads, is the department responsible for opening a criminal investigation.

Statute of limitations? LOL On Jan 21 2013, President Romney's new AG could take action against Holder, could he not?
5 posted on 06/28/2012 9:41:04 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
Statute of limitations? LOL On Jan 21 2013, President Romney's new AG could take action against Holder, could he not?

Very good point. I believe Chairman Issa stated today that his committee would be continuing the investigation. The criminal contempt citation doesn't have to be referred to the Justice Department immediately, but it does make any possible future destruction of records a much more serious issue. It is quite likely that if it is held for a new administration, the new AG would want an independent persecutor to avoid political implications.

These things normally take a long time to resolve. Look at the Roger Clemens affair. He testified before Congress in February of 2008 and the case wasn't completed until recently.

6 posted on 06/28/2012 10:19:11 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

“Statute of limitations? LOL On Jan 21 2013, President Romney’s new AG could take action against Holder, could he not?”

Dubya did nothing about all of the Clinton cartel corruption that preceded him, so what makes anyone think Romney would go after the Obamination’s stains left on our republic?

Bush was a conservative patriot compared to Romney.

Does anyone think Romney, if elected, will actually perform according to his newfound conservative blabber?


7 posted on 06/29/2012 4:16:23 AM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson