Posted on 05/10/2012 6:33:32 AM PDT by xzins
Barack Obama has come out of the closet....at least about gay marriage. Until now he has kept Willie and Pete stuffed in a corner behind Moochelle's expensive sweaters and shoes. Tiring of hiding them, and with so much cash and positive media coverage at stake, he finally ushered them out into the limelight as his version of North Carolina smackdown. How dare those yokel Tarheels vote down gay marriage! Damn hillbillies!
Republicans have rallied to North Carolina's side!
Uhhh....wait a minute...last night's Fox News "Red Eye" spent most of the showing demeaning all things North Carolina decision as well. How dare they vote down everyone's God given right to poke holes in a cesspool. (See Romans 1&2 about same-sex relationships and inexcusable violations of nature.)
Now for Republicans, the bad news. (No, I actually mean conservatives who are supporting the GOP so far this year. If it ever did, Republican no longer equals conservative.)
Mitt Romney had gay marriage out of his closet years ago. So the only question is this. When responding to Obama's initiative is it best for a conservative: (1) To be silent (The “I need to avoid hypocrisy” response), or (2) To Say "Romney did it too." (The “I want some media adulation too” response), or (3) To say, "Romney did it best!" (The “proudly grab the initiative” response.)
Please spare me the arguments about Romney either converting or not really being able to help what he did. If he converts any more than he has in the past, Romney will get his own Transformer action figure.
And if we argue "He couldn't help it." maybe he should get his own bobblehead, 'cause the Good Lord knows, it's enough to make you laugh at a silly drifting with the wind character. And it will keep you from crying.
You missed my point. I was just referring those nonsense comments regarding Obama vs Romney (or whoever runs against him). I do not like Romney, but he sure is much better than Obama, at least stood against gay marriage when I was in Mass.
That is technically true, but the Obamabots are way left of the typical Mitt bot. And in fact, while no real conservatives are Mitt bots, he will have large "support" from ABO folks, who are way right of Obama Bots. I realize its' stylish on FR to lump Mitt and Obama together - but lumping their supporters together is just intellectually illogical.
Let me suggest that it is the socialists that use government to impose their morality and their sense of justice upon us all that is the main issue. The balance sheet is simply a symptom and homosexual sex premised rights are one issue out of many bankrupt ideas that taxpayers are forced to foot the bill for.
Useful idiots are the ones claiming there is a disconnect between government imposed moral bankruptcy and the subsequent fiscal bankruptcy e.g. bad economy that results.
What drives the government to manipulate the economy?
In this topic discussion, who would be paying benefits to homosexual sex partners nationwide and now pays benefits to homosexual sex partners at the federal level?
Get a clue or get out out of the way.
It is becoming apparent that the DNC (with the help of the media) are going to keep throwing this crap out to keep the discussion everywhere but where it should be: the economy.
Anyone can point to a deficit; however, leadership requires pointing out the cause and to some degree greater than spending too much. The cause of spending too much is a big government that imposes it sense of morality upon the people. It is a government religion that seeks to impose all manners of 'justice' that we as conservatives are fighting against!
So ask yourself, how exactly does one seek to stop the spending on a bankrupt ideology WITHOUT addressing it, WITHOUT pointing out its flaws, and WITHOUT stopping it dead in its tracks?
Are you really so naive as to suggest our best chance of victory entails sacrificing the promotion of a conservative ideology?
Think about what you are promoting -a successful defeat! You seem ONLY interested in gaining power -just like the enemy now in 1600 Pennsylavania Avenue.
Obama the king is gone, all hail king Romney -long live the spendthrift king -- LOL!!!!
Get a clue or step aside.
Thanks for the ping!
I never said anything even remotely close to what you suggest.
Get a life.
Everything I listed are red herrings thrown out by the Obama administration. There is no GOP war on women and the President has absolutely no voice on issues such as gay marriage.
Responding to red herrings is beyond stupid.
You did not respond to the details of my posting -instead calling it a red herring...
-here is a portion reposted, followed by a supplemental with the hope that I might clue you in.
Anyone can point to a deficit; however, leadership requires pointing out the cause and to some degree greater than spending too much. The cause of spending too much is a big government that imposes it sense of morality upon the people. It is a government religion that seeks to impose all manners of 'justice' that we as conservatives are fighting against!So ask yourself, how exactly does one seek to stop the spending on a bankrupt ideology WITHOUT addressing it, WITHOUT pointing out its flaws, and WITHOUT stopping it dead in its tracks?
NOW you claim the President has no voice on issues such as gay marriage? I beg to disagree with some facts. The President via his administration has and is interpreting policy, issuing executive orders, and subjectively and selectively enforcing laws to accomplish the following:
1. Marriage comparable benefits for homosexual sex couples where one of the disordered perverts is federally employed...
2. The US State Department is promoting a homosexual sex premised "Rainbow Spring" around the world seeking "orifice diversity" and "orientation justice"...
3. The US State Department is promoting abortion and birth control under the premise of woman's health, violence prevention, and gender justice...
4. Health care services such as abortion and birth control under the premise of woman's health are being funded under new administration interpretations and policies regarding health care...
In essence, a morally devoid government religion is being imposed upon the people and the people are being forced to pay for it and you think that is just fine -no big deal -a red herring?
LOL!!!! I hate to ruin your day and point out your conservativeness is really a fallacy. Even IF as you claim, the economy e.g. fiscal matters are paramount THEN you could at least acknowledge that all these government imposed moral justices COST MONEY. --But no, YOU instead sound like either a Libertarian or a RINO... You either support government funding and promotion of justice perverted or you opposes it. There is no in between!
I never called anything you said a red herring.
It is obvious you are better at talking than reading.
There is no reason for you to respond, as I am too busy to read your trite gibberish.
It would seem that your mind is made up that the state of our economy is disconnected completely from the morally bankrupt ideology government imposes upon the people...
In essence, talking about the economy e.g. "it's the economy dummy" is all talk and no walk UNLESS one confronts the reason government spends and then decides which spending is legitimate versus illegitimate -the decision to spend or not spend, fund or not fund SHOULD be premised upon the law and the moral and inalienable principles our country was founded upon -NOT premised upon mob rules whether it be our mob or theirs.
True conservatives understand that a republican RINO collective is as much a danger to individual freedom as a democrat collective is. All these supposed non issues are the reason the economy is where it is today -the economy is but a symptom of an all to powerful government that imposing a bankrupt ideology upon the people.
My gibberish will continue REGARDLESS and RINOs comprehend it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.