The point remains: the person who may well have photographed Breitbart’s body died right at the point in time when the photos he took would be the only proof of assassination that would come out in the final autopsy results due out a week later.
The ER staff and cops say the death is suspicious. Speculation, sure, but that’s what they’re trained to identify and investigate.
There are a BUNCH of dots - facts - which when put all together form a pretty clear picture.
I’ve asked you for your explanation for some of those dots and you won’t give me one. For instance, why did Breitbart’s friends claim that he was hospitalized for 2 weeks after a heart attack within the last year when the coroner says he hadn’t seen a doctor in over a year and there were no prescription meds in his body? You’re riding us for making assumptions based on the facts we do have rather than waiting for more facts - but there is DISINFORMATION being put out there that also needs to be explained. Why the disinformation from people who are SUPPOSED to be more trustworthy because they have access to know the truth?
The disinformation is one dot. There are a lot more. And together they form a very clear picture.
Are you aware of the threats made to the media if they reported on the eligibility issue? Are you aware of the threats and the actual deaths (Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs) that were used to scare Bill and Hillary away from pursuing the eligibility issue? Are you aware of the media personnel who have quit their jobs or left the country because of the threats? Are you aware of Breitbart’s conversation with Arpaio less than 5 hours before he died? Are you aware of the bomb scare for Rush Limbaugh the same day as Arpaio’s presser? Are you aware of the killing of Osama bin Laden as soon as people began to realize his long-form was fake?
These are all dots that have to be accounted for. There are also more personal dots - stuff that I have seen which tell me what these people are like. If they keep tabs on piddly old me, I can only imagine how they have Breitbart monitored.
Well, I had to look up Gwatney and Tubbs (Jones) since I wasn’t familiar with either. I don’t necessarily see anything suspicious in either case. Ms. Tubbs Jones died from an aneurysm, not exactly unusual. Mr. Gwatney was killed by a guy named Timothy Johnson, who was in turn killed by police. There was no apparent motive. Mr. Johnson, however, quit his job at Target following an outburst and records show he voted Republican in the previous primary. Doesn’t sound like a Chicago way thug to me.
There is a NYT piece describing the above, but I lost the link. If you wish, I can try to find it..
I did find a couple of blogs which state the “dots” you mention. Sorry, but I don’t find blogs to be reliable sources of information. Sound to me like authors putting forth a lot of theory and suspicion without much fact.
Look, I wouldn’t put anything past Obama and his henchmen, but right now, I don’t think there is enough real evidence to warrant a further investigation. I doubt anyone with investigative and/or prosecutorial authority would move ahead based on allegations from Freepers and blog posts by conspiracy theorists.