Posted on 04/04/2012 10:00:40 AM PDT by sussex
Forty something UK journalist Samantha Brick should be scored a perfect ten for achieving maximum publicity with minimum talent. Her cri de coeur about the downside of being so beautiful has impacted the world like a tsunami.
(Excerpt) Read more at theagedp.com ...
Meh...
Guilty.
She’s not hot enough to be that conceited
Someone posted yesterday (same story/similar thread) that she’s British and has all her teeth.
“If Brad Pitt were to say: ‘Yes, I’m a good-looking fella,’ then the world would nod sagely in agreement. But if Angelina Jolie uttered something along those lines, she’d be subject to the same foaming-at-the-mouth onslaught hurled at me yesterday.”
Being blond, and wearing a beyond tight dress, and looking stupid, she can probably get a job with FOX News.
People hate you because you bark all night.
Sorry darling, but if Angelina Jolie said she was good looking people might attack her for being conceited - but few would deny that she was a head turner.
I love the extra pictures also. The one with her in purple dress beside her husband shows a big round potbelly. I've seen better looking potbellies on a PIG!
She might well be, for her age, a British 6; fairly plain looking but attractive.
She is an American 5 at best; average looking.
And decidedly an L.A. 4 or below; bartender - another drink please.
With her attitude she seems more like a 3; maybe if nobody saw me with her.
Possibly a 2; not even with another man's p#nis.
But not a 1: “the stuff of nightmares”.
Looks a bit like Lis Weihl from FOX, not as foxy as most of the rest. I guess she was raised with a good self-image.
Egotistical, deluded and plain is no way to go through life, Miss.
I’m guessing women hate her for the same reason men love her: because she puts out a lot of sexual energy that declare “I’m easy”.
That is why she gets male attention. It ain’t because of her looks. Trust me. She’s a 6 on a 10 scale. Not ugly, but not all that.
Plus, she is obviously arrogant and full of herself, another strike against her.
She may not have the looks that would make a train take a dirt road but she leans more toward that side of the scale than the pinup side.
I recognized Madona right away but it took me a little longer on Bruce Springsteen. When did he take up hunting?
That's a helluva good line, sir!
Besides a rather unfortunate face and smile- she has let her body go to the dogs.
Is this for real???
Stand her up against a Mud Fence and it would be a Draw at Best.
Psyop.
The ludicrousness of the article is the first big hint. For an obviously average looking woman to openly claim to be hated by other women because of her beauty, and then have this idiocy turned into an actual news story, is clearly meant to inflame millions of women - which it has.
But why? Well, look at this picture. Ever seen anything like it? I mean, EVER? It's pretty weird - that's her husband. In camo. With a rifle. In EUROPE. And she's a Brit - you know, where forks are considered deadly wepons that have to be registered. And why shouldn't he just dress normally, as she has? Or why doesn't she dress in camo too, and have the phot be outside?
Because you're supposed to note the contrast, and make the association - because this is obviously targeted at women.
And women will look at this picture and see Sarah and Todd Palin.
But - who is playing Sarah? This execrable, insulting narcissist who is crowing that ultimate challenge amongst women - "I'm prettier than you." So as a woman, you hate her. And by association through the picture, you then hate Sarah.
Crazy? No. Psychodynamics and emotional manipulation - yes indeed. And it's crude as a brick thrown through a window, and contemptuous of the integrity and intelligence of its targeted victims.
In other words, Hillary. Hillary the hag bitch who is going to be running against the beautiful Sarah Palin. Hillary the hag bitch who is going to be going for the female vote, but who has utter contempt for women - so she yanks them around on choke chains based on their lowest emotions.
This is a psyop, folks. It doesn't add up any other way.
Hillary's running - against Sarah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.