Posted on 03/29/2012 7:38:52 AM PDT by CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Nadya Suleman tells the British magazine Closer, I will be celibate for the next 15 years. Too bad she didnt take her vow of celibacy 15 years ago.
Then, maybe, she wouldnt have the 14 children shes raising without benefit of a loving, supportive husband. Then, maybe, she wouldnt have taken $10,000 from the magazine to pose in the semi-nude.
The 36-year-old California serial mom put out for the magazine because she apparently is hard up for money.
She doesnt get child support from any of her babies daddies. Neither the six resulting from five pregnancies beginning in 2001. Nor the octuplets she bore in 2009, for which she earned the ignominious moniker Octomom.
She no longer receives state welfare benefits, for some unspecified reason. And she doesnt work because she has her 14 kids to look after.
Meanwhile, because Octomom hasnt been making the kind of money she used to from paid interviews and fully-clothed photo shoots, she has fallen eight months behind on her mortgage. Her attorney says she is facing eviction as early as this week.
So she took her clothes off for the British mag to earn enough to move herself and her brood into a rental home.
What saddens is that Suleman thinks her children are just fine. I cant believe how fortunate they are, she said.
Well, no one in her right mind would wish such dubious fortune upon any child:
To be born out of wedlock, one of 14 children raised by a single mom. To grow up without a father. To live in poverty. To have a mom who takes money to pose in nothing but a pair of nude panties.
If all 14 of Octomoms children make it to adulthood without succumbing to some pathology or another it will be nothing short of a miracle.
Given the circumstances under which they are being raised, it is almost certain that one (or three or more) will be a substance abuser, or teen parent, or school dropout or criminal offender.
That is the future to which Suleman has condemned her pitiable children. Let us pray the unfit mom bears no more.
I wish everyone would just stop talking about her. That whole situation is a human train wreck of unfathomable proportions.
As humans we are beginning to play around with things that we have the analytical minds to create, but not the morality to control.
Lack of celibacy has nothing to do her fourteen kids. I think they were all in vitro fertilizations.
I will come to the house of the first freeper that post any pictures of this, I am trying to eat here.
I cant believe how fortunate they are,
Well, it’s true, they are at least alive which is
more than you can say for 50 million others.
I don’t know the history of her prior pregnancies, but I do know the octuplets were conceived through the use of artificial insemination plus fertility drugs.
The emphasis on celibacy or not celibacy, in the article, seems off point to me, in that I never heard of this woman until the octuplets she had by other than natural means.
In this case, “TTIWWP” stands for “This Thread is Worthless WITH Pictures.”
Well, yeah! That works too!
She’s got more stretch marks than a taffy factory!
There once was an old lady
Who lived in a shoe
She had so many kids
Her uterus fell out.....OH!
Good one.
She getting thrown from her home. The $10,000 she just got should last one more month. What then?
—Good grief - isn’t this woman’s 15 minutes of fame up yet!—
I never heard of her until I saw this thread. But that’s as far as it goes for me. No longer interested...
they air brushed ‘em out.
I can still remember when a child born out of wedlock was called a bastard child.
Apropos of the content, one comment. You wrote:
"She doesnt get child support from any of her babies daddies. Neither the six resulting from five pregnancies beginning in 2001. Nor the octuplets she bore in 2009..."My understanding is that she conceived only via in-vitro fertilization (IVF), and that all the sperm were intentionally from the same donor so that the children are all biologically true siblings. If so, your criticisms regarding child support and plural "daddies" are irrelevant.
Her situation disgusts and repulses me -- I'm neither defending nor excusing. But if one is going to ride a high horse, accuracy in the verifiable facts is important. Just trying to help out....
“they air brushed em out.”
Tham must be a big arse brush!
Thank you, dayglored. Still new here. I know her babies were conceived through IVF, but they still have biological fathers. Suleman chose to bring her children into the world without benefit of a loving, supportive husband. Thus, her children have no fatherly financial support. Thus, she’s posing semi-nude to make a few bucks.
looks like she’s slimmed up quite a bit, still a bit of a belly, but not that bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.