Do you HATE Evolution? Black Student Throws a Fit in Florida Evolution Class

Cure Socialism ^ | March 22, 2012 | Jonathon Moseley

[SunTzuWu]

Do you hate evolution with a passion, yet?

The problem isn't evolution. The problen is stupid people.

[Westbrook]

> Evolution is inherently racist. There is only one race - the human race.

Agree 100%. Could not have said it better.

[Lady Lucky]

mongor lackeys

That's RACISS!

[Sherman Logan]

PRESERVASION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE

For what it's worth, when Darwin wrote this the word "race" had not yet acquired many of its present day connotation. Nazism, eugenics, etc. were all in the future.

"Race" at the time meant roughly the same as "species," and it was used for plants and animals as well as people. Considering how much he wrote, there is surprisingly little evidence Darwin was racist, even by today's standards. He probably accepted the conventional wisdom (believed scientific) of his day that some groups of humans were inherently superior to other groups. But since he wrote so little about it, it obviously wasn't a big issue for him.

[nerdwithagun]

Bringing up this woman is a bad idea in the debate over evolution. She was A) psychotic, acting violently and a second video of what happens after she is being pulled out by the police shows her being tazed. B) A nasty racist making violent threats at white people. In fairness, her racism might be caused by her being psychotic.

[Matchett-PI]

Why Darwinists Reject Evolution

"....Darwinists specifically do not believe in evolution, being that they reject its very possibility (i.e., directional change into an intrinsically higher state). Rather, they believe in change, a very different thing. In this regard, they are very much like progressives, who also believe in change, but not genuine progress, since their metaphysic abolishes any absolute standard by which real progress can be measured. ..."

[Moseley]

Peacock is code language for black woman? News to me.

No, of course not. But the class was being taught about how evolution means individuals choosing the "SUPERIOR" choice for mating over the "INFERIOR" choice, and that life IMPROVES over time when the "BETTER" mates are chosen instead of the "WORSE" mates.

Carr, as a Black woman, has internalized the assumption that she, as a Black woman, is the inferior choice, and that -- according to evolution -- men are going to choose BETTER women than her, and that THAT IS A GOOD THING.

Her being rejected by men is the essence of evolution and long-term improvement of the human race.

Hate to stir things up, but, why is it common for prominent black men to have white wives, but not the reverse?? If we’re talking about perceived superior mates and all that, do we really want to go there, talking about how people choose mates????????

That's the ASSUMPTION that I believe is animating Carr's violent reaction. True or untrue, Black women perceive that EVEN BLACK MEN would rather have a White woman than Carr.

So evolution = rejecting Black women like Carr as being the bottom of the trash heap.

And if you want to talk about self-esteem issues among young women, evolution teaches that they have no value in and of themselves, but only in competition for a man's seed in relation to other "better" women.

A proper understanding of Christian thinking teaches that DIFFERENT MEN WILL WANT DIFFERENT THINGS because God intended and planned for our differences and diversity. So where one woman is different from other women, THERE IS A MAN WHO WILL PREFER HER AS AN INDIVIDIUAL.

But evolution teaches that there is only one "best" type of woman, and that *ALL* men are going to prefer that one type of woman, ranking all other women as "WORSE" or inferior.

So under an evolutionary mindset, most women will "lose" out to the "best" superior women.

[qam1]

So this Black woman is obviously perceiving that evolution means that men will choose the SUPERIOR candidate for mating and reproduction, and evolution produces "improvement" over time by men selecting SUPERIOR women -- meaning NOT HER.

Whereas Christianity teaches the value and infinite worth of E V E R Y human being in God's eyes,

Soooo Christian men don't look at looks or other charactericts when choosing a mate?

Suuuuurrrrre!!!

This article is just stupid

[Calvin Locke]

Go watch the video. Drudge had the FAU story linked last night. I had to go searching for the easily found video.

For whatever reason, by the time the cameras came out, she was on her way to almost full melt-down mode. Then the death threats started.

The story itself is of interest because of the meltdown.

[Eva]

This might not have been as spontaneous as it is portrayed to be.

The left has been turning against Darwin and his buddy, who came up with the survival of the fittest theory for quite a while. it just doesn’t fit with the endangered species act and the socialist nanny state.

As this woman points out, it’s also in conflict with post modernist progressivism, which holds that all history is nothing but a work of fiction, a meta narrative, designed to oppress the brown people and prop up the Western White Male.

Barack Obama has even mentioned this theme in speeches, saying that our country was not founded on survival of the fittest. (little bit of cognitive dissonance there).

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Evolution also implies that the black race is inferior to the white race because blacks are one evolutionary step closer to the primate class.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

sorry, forgot to add...according to post-bellum Democrats.

Fat fingered this morning.

[Matchett-PI]

"The problem isn't evolution. The problen is stupid people."

A major proof of a higher intelligence is curiosity.

The UNcurios would never even think to ask, "Which theory of evolution are you talking about?"

[TexasCajun]

The only thing missing was her jumping on the teacher's desk.

...just another episode of.

Black Girls Gone Wild !!

[count-your-change]

The woman hates evolution because she assumes it to be so.
And that by implication she is being short changed by an evolutionary process. Just some of the nonsense that we can set aside if we believe “the truth will set you free” as Christ said.

[Joe Brower]

"it's ELVIS-lution"

Hah! Beat me to it. That song still cracks me up.

[Moseley]

Evolution exists, like the law of gravity.

Evolution is a HYPOTHESIS which has never been tested and cannot be tested or confirmed pursuant to the Scientific Method.

Evolution is not a theory, in the technical sense. It is not a law.

Evolution is a HYPOTHESIS which is put forward to try to explain the observable world.

But to make it remotely scientific, the evolutionary hypothesis must be TESTED by a repeatable experiment under controlled conditions which is capable of proving or disproving the hypothesis. Experiments must then be REPEATED under varying conditions by various neutral and independent researchers at different locations.

Remember cold fusion? Cold fusion was "proven" as a cheap, clean, limitless energy source by laboratory experiments in Utah. But nobody could reproduce those results anywhere else in any other laboratory. This produced whispers (unfairly) of fraud or deceit.

The evolutionary hypothesis not only has not ever been tested, but it is of course incapable of being tested. Even if we found life on another planet, that would not tell us where life came from on Earth.

The very first things that we learn about science -- and then promptly forget -- is the LIMITATIONS of science and the unprovable assumptions on which scientific analysis is based. There are some things that science can do and somethings it simply cannot. Science is simply not valid outside of its zone of competence.

THE PROBLEM IS that evolutionists refuse to DEFINE what evolution is.

We can very simply "prove" that evolution has never been proven: Evolutionists refuse to DEFINE it.

How can you "prove" something you have never defined?

Evolutionists flip flop around like a freshly-caught fish on a dock, between ORIGIN Of life, DRIFT within species, never-proven transitions BETWEEN species, or just the existence of species that are now longer living.

When evolution is discussed, evolutionists CHANGE CHANNELS RAPIDLY between these different concepts of evolution, yet claim that it has been proven.

[Pecos]

No stranger than the rants encountered here any time Romney’s religion is mentioned.

[allmendream]

The theory of evolution doesn’t teach that blacks are inferior in any way shape or form - other than if they live where their skin filters out too much sunlight and they cannot synthesize enough vitamin D and they don’t take vitamin D supplements - then they might get rickets.

Black skin is absolutely a “superior” adaptation in Africa - otherwise the lighter skinned variations would have predominated over the generations.

Moreover acceptance of the theory of evolution no more necessitates the idea that God did not create humans than acceptance of the theory of nuclear fusion means that God did not create our Sun.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Honest to God - had heard it in a while; now I’ve walking around the office humming and smiling