Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: livius
The individual mandate is not the problem, because just having to get a certain dollar amount of insurance coverage from independent companies or post a bond is exactly like automobile insurance.

No, it isn't exactly like auto insurance. You are required to hold liability auto insurance, to protect other people whom you may injure. You are not required to hold collision insurance to protect yourself. The Obama mandate is equivalent to requiring you to hold collision insurance, since it's to pay your medical bills.

66 posted on 03/16/2012 9:46:43 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: JoeFromSidney

Yes, but otherwise, the state ends up paying your medical bills, unless you happen to have assets (and many people do not).

In my mind, the big problem is that they are aiming for a single payer, and the government is requiring things in the coverage that should not be there...as Rush or perhaps Neal Boortz said once, it would be like having your auto insurance pay for your oil changes. Imagine the price!

But in this case, the government is using insurance to impose government policies (population control, for example).


67 posted on 03/16/2012 9:57:00 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson