Posted on 03/11/2012 5:56:18 PM PDT by katiedidit1
"Another presidential candidate had an energy proposal back in 2008 as well. Former Senator Rick Santorums ideas, however, went an entirely different direction. Rather than increasing production, his solution was to reduce US oil appetite in an article he wrote, titled, Reducing U.S. oil appetite This is one cause that could be helped by smart mandates and taxing
(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...
Thanks, katie!
I’ve never cared for Rick S., and have despised him even more during the Primaries as he has tried to portray himself as Conservative (like Romney does). ....Rick apparently forgets that his past is available to the public.
Ethanol mandates and subsidies must be canceled!
Nice try but if these lies had legs they would be loudly heralded by every MSM outlet in America.
I think its kind of funny. These clowns come running to smear Rick Santorum with this crap from years ago, realize that Gingrich still has a mouthful and they’re trying to scrape it off their shoes and get away from it.
Agreed. If someone is looking for a topic to drop one candidate to select another, ethanol is not the deciding factor.
Anyone who has not made arrangements for themselves to cover medical expenses depends on the government or someone else when medical attention is needed. Santorum, Romney and Obama want the public to pay for their medical expenses but Newt wants them to make arrangements to take care of themselves. Which of those options looks more like fascism to you?
Your post brings up why our country will not survive. We vote our wallets. In the end it will (actually, it HAS) kill us.
No wonder he did so well in Iowa. He could’ve been there that whole year talking ethanol mandates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.