Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FORTH EORLINGAS!
1 posted on 03/05/2012 9:05:07 PM PST by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

What I’d like to know is why a man that usually relies so heavily on facts didn’t bother to READ what was being touted as ‘testimony’ though it really wasn’t.

Why didn’t he read it first!?


2 posted on 03/05/2012 9:13:15 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; freedumb2003; ...
"Polly wanna condom" birdcage *PING*.

BTW, posting past my bedtime, the obligatory typo: in the bottom section, I switched Carbonite and AOL, and substituted 3,600 for 4,600.

Obviously a right-wing conspiracy on my part.

Cheers!

3 posted on 03/05/2012 9:13:30 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

I am Breitbart! Ride Sons of Eorl!

I admonish you to keep your hearth warm, and your powder dry;-)


4 posted on 03/05/2012 9:15:01 PM PST by SgtBob (Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
Pelosi set up an opportunity for Fluke to parade her script as though it were testimony before the whole committee...I'm betting about five times as many in the general public found Fluke's whining about having birth control paid for by others offensive and even repulsive as found it acceptable or admirable - and no one would have ever heard it had Limbaugh not called her a "slut" - he may be vindicated yet.....
5 posted on 03/05/2012 9:17:03 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
New word for the urban dictionary like Lewinski ... a Fluke aka trollop
7 posted on 03/05/2012 9:20:39 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
OBAMAGUARD, GOVERNMENT MANDATED CONTRACEPTIVES IN ACTION
8 posted on 03/05/2012 9:23:19 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
Thanks for the inspiration grey_whiskers...

OBAMAS TROJAN, OBAMA'S TROJAN
15 posted on 03/05/2012 10:08:12 PM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

bttt


16 posted on 03/05/2012 10:19:24 PM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Rush should never, ever have apologized.

The ONLY response the Left EVER has to an apology is to crow “it changes nothing”!

It’s merely an opportunity for them to rub your face into something THEY set up, and then declare what you did was so heinous that it would literally go against morality to forgive you - i.e. zero tolerance in the name of protecting tolerance.

The Left is VILE. That is Rule 1.

If they serve up global peace, universal happiness, and eternal life, just remember Rule 1, and you won’t be fooled.

They mean to destroy everyone - it’s their only goal.

And hijacking Every Good Thing is their number one modus operandi.

What do they want? What the Muslims want - that’s why they get along.

A dead planet.


17 posted on 03/05/2012 10:20:32 PM PST by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
Rush took what was an excellent opportunity to make a strong point about big government intruding on religious liberty and turned it into a sophomoric social conservative's name-calling session. But as he says, talking about the social issues helps Republicans.

Sure, Rush, especially when you do it with as much warmth and finesse as you and Sineater Santorum.

18 posted on 03/05/2012 10:44:49 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

21 posted on 03/05/2012 11:45:09 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers
We are all Breitbart

.

22 posted on 03/05/2012 11:47:55 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; LucyT
And a liberal group, in a MASSIVE online campaign, captures 360,000 people in a petition to condemn Rush.

Rush Limbaugh
About
The Official Facebook Page of America's Anchorman
1,037,985 like this
35,945 talking about this

Sounds impressive, right?

Kind of like the signatures in the Scott Walker recall. The numbers sound impressive, except that even if you include the phony signatures that were submitted, the total number is still only a fraction of the number of people that voted for Scott Walker in the general election!

From FOX News: The rush to censor Limbaugh

So why are the Left and the media still pushing and publicizing a campaign for advertisers to dump the Limbaugh show and end his career?

Because it has little to do with his words. This is all about disingenuous politics. Liberals want this government-mandate controversy to be not about religious liberty, which is devastating, but about contraceptives, which works in their favor.

That is intellectually dishonest.

They want to position conservatives as “anti-women.” That’s as ugly as it is untrue.

Everyone remembers Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a “slut” on his radio show.

Fellow talk show host Mike Malloy hoped Sarah Palin “drives herself into madness” and insisted Michele Bachmann is an “evil bitch from Hell” who would have gladly supervised the Holocaust.

Montel Williams rooted on Air America for Bachmann to slit her own wrist or throat.

Randi Rhodes insisted that teenage boys weren’t safe from Palin’s advances if they stayed over at her house. There’s no news coverage or “war on women” narrative when the mud-covered women are conservatives.

Maybe these hosts aren’t prominent enough?

Then consider the case study of Bill Maher, who’s welcomed all over TV news shows.

A year ago on his HBO show, he called Sarah Palin a “dumb twat.”

He followed up days later in a Dallas stand-up routine by calling Palin the C-word.

Last July on HBO, he said Palin was “a bully who sells patriotism like a pimp, and the leader of a strange family of inbred weirdos.”

Last September on his show, Maher said Palin would have sex with Rick Perry if he was black.

Days after he called Palin the T-word, he appeared with then-CNN host Eliot Spitzer, where Spitzer concluded, “Your show is brilliant. I love watching it.”

On Sunday, Democratic Party chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz huffed on “Meet the Press” that "I don't know any woman in America that thinks that being called a slut is funny." But two months ago, she accepted an invitation to sit on the set with the man who called Palin a “c---.”

A couple of years ago, “comedian” Louis CK “joked” on the Opie and Anthony radio show about Palin coming to the Republican convention “holding a baby that just came out of her f-ing, disgusting [C-word], her f-ing retard-making [C-word]. I hate her more than anybody,” he said.

On Twitter, this “comedian” attacked Palin in 2011 as a “f—ing jackoff [C-word]-face jazzy wondergirl” who “has a family of Chinese poor people living in her [C-word] hole.”

Guess which event this same fellow is headlining in June? -- The Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner.

WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?!?!?


24 posted on 03/06/2012 1:48:35 AM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

; )

25 posted on 03/06/2012 4:41:57 AM PST by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; Anoreth
FORTH EORLINGAS!

I think I'm too repressed to be Breitbart ... but I'm the mother of more than one!

26 posted on 03/06/2012 5:21:55 AM PST by Tax-chick (Maybe it IS about contraception. Read "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" decision, 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson