Is that a hallmark of a professional police investigation to you. How is it possible to call this an impartial investigation?
First let us look at the facts. Are you saying the facts are in question that were revealed?
Then let's look at Zullo and Corsi. How much of the ten dollars per copy is profit to them? Do you know?
Do you know if the ten dollars per copy is even enough to pay for the copying and assembly? Have copies of other investigations been released for ten dollars?
Or for more?
Do you know what their motivations are for sure, or is that conjecture on your part?
Then, once you have successfully cast aspersions on the two of them for their alleged financial bonanza by selling these copies, will you then attack Corsi for being a loon?
Your tactics are actually illustrative of the Left. When you can't argue facts, argue the personalities involved.
So let me play. What do you think of a Freeper who posts hundreds of posts at all hours of the day and night on the threads where the legal aspects of whether Obama is a natural born citizen is the only topic? What would that motive be? Is there some kind of profit involved there? Perhaps a paid disruptor? After all, you have a very recent sign in date. And you post on basically one subject--the subject you seem to have an over-riding interest in--President Obama.
Not much interest from you on all the other topics of the day.
See, it is not so hard to cast aspersions on people and motives. Lawyers do it all the time to create doubt.
The key is not to look at personalities, but the facts of the case. What say you about the facts?
Its an e-book - no copying or assembly required.
Does it really matter what his cut is?
I would assume any author shares profit with publisher and distributor.
Do you have any evidence that the profits from the book are being applied elsewhere?
I would say the facts are the result of a tainted investigation.
Look - if real LEOs were to pull such a stunt they would be fired and possibly prosecuted.
If we are a nation of.laws then justice has to be impartial. A financial incentive to come.to.a certain result is not impartial.
No prosecutor or judge in the country would accept such behavior. The entire investigation would be tainted and thrown out.