Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Irenic; DiogenesLamp
"It is what it is and he is there until we vote his butt out or his time runs out."

If he and his enablers can get away with fraud of this magnitude, what makes you think that your puny vote or any time on a hypothetical "clock" will matter in the least to your new overlords?

It only IS for as long as we allow it to continue without resisting. Every single person I've met who was ignorant on this subject and whom I've ever had the opportunity to explain this issue to, in some depth, has had a "holy cr@p!" moment when their eyes were opened to the insane bs that is being allowed to happen at the very highest levels of our government, our supposed (erstwhile, in my opinion) servants and stewards.

DL,
The major issue I have with your adoption theory is this: If the state government issued a re-created edition of a birth certificate for adoption purposes and prior records were sealed by court order, why would the WH put up a computer-generated image instead of a simple scanned copy of an abstract that Hawaii created and printed on security paper which ostensibly Barry's attorney went to that state to retrieve two hard copies of?

207 posted on 03/02/2012 7:52:11 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Flotsam_Jetsome

IMHO this thread is all about muddying the waters and distraction and the OP getting his jollies doing so.


220 posted on 03/03/2012 10:49:48 AM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
DL, The major issue I have with your adoption theory is this: If the state government issued a re-created edition of a birth certificate for adoption purposes and prior records were sealed by court order, why would the WH put up a computer-generated image instead of a simple scanned copy of an abstract that Hawaii created and printed on security paper which ostensibly Barry's attorney went to that state to retrieve two hard copies of?

Here is my theory. The PDF file we see has that green anti-copy crosshatch on it, while the "physical copy" does not. The Green crosshatch was obviously added to the document last. (IMO)

I think the original PDF file was sent to the White House in an Email from DOH Hawaii, (or perhaps to Obama's Lawyer) and rather than go to the trouble of scanning the physical document (Which may be completely under the Control of Obama or His Lawyer to the point where he won't even let his staff have it) and then adding the green crosshatch, the dumbasses on his staff simply used the emailed copy, not knowing that it contained the evidence of it's creation within it.

I also don't think the staff at DOH Hawaii knew enough about computer technology to be aware that the file would contain the information used to construct it. I think people who tend to work in Government (in fields other than Computer Technology) are relatively ignorant and naive about computer technology. A member of an IT staff would have known about this problem.

As a result of ignorance on the part of DOH Hawaii bureaucrats, and as a result of ignorance on the part of Obama's White House staff, we were allowed to discover information that they didn't know was *IN* the PDF File. By the time they had been made aware of it, it was too late to do anything about it. (The Internet is Forever baby!) The only thing they could do was to pretend they hadn't done something stupid.

Does this explanation seem reasonable?

230 posted on 03/03/2012 12:52:25 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson