Here is my theory. The PDF file we see has that green anti-copy crosshatch on it, while the "physical copy" does not. The Green crosshatch was obviously added to the document last. (IMO)
I think the original PDF file was sent to the White House in an Email from DOH Hawaii, (or perhaps to Obama's Lawyer) and rather than go to the trouble of scanning the physical document (Which may be completely under the Control of Obama or His Lawyer to the point where he won't even let his staff have it) and then adding the green crosshatch, the dumbasses on his staff simply used the emailed copy, not knowing that it contained the evidence of it's creation within it.
I also don't think the staff at DOH Hawaii knew enough about computer technology to be aware that the file would contain the information used to construct it. I think people who tend to work in Government (in fields other than Computer Technology) are relatively ignorant and naive about computer technology. A member of an IT staff would have known about this problem.
As a result of ignorance on the part of DOH Hawaii bureaucrats, and as a result of ignorance on the part of Obama's White House staff, we were allowed to discover information that they didn't know was *IN* the PDF File. By the time they had been made aware of it, it was too late to do anything about it. (The Internet is Forever baby!) The only thing they could do was to pretend they hadn't done something stupid.
Does this explanation seem reasonable?
Somewhat. I have seen my fair share of idiocy/incompetence on the part of government employees. A few things still bother, however:
1. Why would HDOH email a copy of the PDF construction to the WH?
2. If this kind of "built" document is a commonplace occurrence rather than a one-time event, you'd think that they would have the process systematized, and we should not see anomalies such as "TXE" and smiley faces in the registrar's stamp in the "document".
3. Why go all the way to Hawaii to physically pick up hard copies of the documents only to not go to the trouble of scanning the physical document?
4. If I'm reading you correctly, why would the PDF file sent by HDOH not have the green crosshatch? If such were the case, where then would WH staff have gotten such a background to add to the image that they were going to put up?
You've mentioned previously that you yourself were adopted and that a birth certificate was "built" for you six years after the fact. Does your "built" bc look like the "Obama" long form, complete with signatures, archaic-looking type and markings and whatnot?
Your theory may lie within the realm of possibility (he11, anything is possible with this guy), but a simpler answer would be that whatever "Obama"'s attorney picked up in Hawaii looks nothing like what was posted on the WH servers, and that the image displayed, even if created in the bowels of the HDOH, was not manufactured as part of an above-board, legal process within the constraints of Hawaii law, but rather in secret, and known to only a few highly trusted individuals. Wasn't it put out last year that a forgery had been created for Barry and inserted into the HDOH records, around February 2011 I believe it was?
I'm with Sheriff Joe: I want to see the original microfiche, serial number matched against other rolls in the same series.