Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans Rollback Obama's Pro-Union Regulations
ATR ^ | 2012-02-14 | Christopher Prandoni

Posted on 02/17/2012 9:58:35 AM PST by 92nina

After a yearlong fight, House Republicans land a blow against the politicized National Mediation Board (NMB). After assuming office in 2009, President Obama appointed two pro-union members to the three member NMB, the federal agency that oversees union-employer relations in the transportation industry. Effectively controlling the board, Obama’s Democrat appointees rewrote long-held election law to make it easier for unions to organize transportation workers. While the National Labor Relations Board’s nefarious activity has received much publicity, Obama’s regulatory overreach began with the NMB.

Since the National Railway Act’s was ratified in 1926, a union needed to receive a majority of votes from a working group in order for those workers to be unionized. After Obama’s appointees rewrote the rules with a 2010 rulemaking, unions were only required to receive a majority of all voting members’ votes. This unprecedented rulemaking threatened to disenfranchise workers and was a blatant attempt to inflate union membership numbers, and union dues.

Recognizing how problematic the NMB rulemaking was, Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman John Mica (R-Fla.) inserted a provision (Title IX) into the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill that overturned the NMB rule. During debate of Mica’s bill, Republican Steve LaTourette (R-Ohio) joined Democrats and offered an amendment to strip Chairman Mica’s provision out of the bill. LaTourette failed, but his move highlighted how difficult it would be to get FAA authorization across the finish line, especially with Democrats controlling the Senate and White House. After the Senate passed their predictably bad FAA authorization legislation, the House and Senate conferenced to try and work out the differences between their two pieces of legislation. And there were plenty, but the most contentious deviation was Mica’s NMB provision. Stopgap measures were passed to keep the FAA funded and give House Leadership time to negotiate with Sen. Rockefeller.

After months of contentious debate, the House and Senate agreed to final NMB language—last week both Chambers passed FAA authorization. While it would have been impossible to get Sen. Rockefeller to swallow the provision that overturned the NMB’s pro-union rulemaking, Boehner extracted tangible victories for conservatives.

Read more: http://www.atr.org/house-republicans-rollback-obamas-pro-union-a6733#ixzz1mf74pxr6


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: congress; govtabuse; republicans; unions
After a yearlong fight, House Republicans land a blow against the politicized National Mediation Board (NMB.)

Take this article and others I found to the fight to the Libs on their own turf; put the Left on the defensive at Digg and at Reddit and in Stumbleupon and Delicious

1 posted on 02/17/2012 9:58:50 AM PST by 92nina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 92nina
Thxs, for the post. :-)

2 posted on 02/17/2012 10:07:36 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (remaining) Liberals :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

You’re welcome ;-)


3 posted on 02/17/2012 10:11:41 AM PST by 92nina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 92nina
maybe I'm dense, but doesn't the article contradict the headline? Was the rule rolled back or not? What were Boehner’s tangible victories?
4 posted on 02/17/2012 10:37:57 AM PST by Naplm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Naplm

I agree - what exactly does that last line mean? It sounds like the author ran out of time and just threw that line on there.


5 posted on 02/17/2012 10:50:39 AM PST by Gil4 (Sometimes it's not low self-esteem - it's just accurate self-assessment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Naplm

OK, I re-read the web site. At the top there is a link that says “Originally Published by Townhall.”

Here is a link to the full article.

http://townhall.com/columnists/christopherprandoni/2012/02/13/house_republicans_rollback_obamas_prounion_regulations/page/full/

It sounds like it wasn’t a full roll-back, and now the part that wasn’t rolled back is codified into law. Our victories are rarely real victories.


6 posted on 02/17/2012 10:55:39 AM PST by Gil4 (Sometimes it's not low self-esteem - it's just accurate self-assessment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson