Posted on 02/07/2012 11:50:33 AM PST by TitansAFC
Rick Santorum tells South Carolina voters that he is the only conservative purist in the field, attacking Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney for being unreliable conservatives. Well, THE FREEDOMIST has already exposed Rick Santorum for his betrayal of a core conservative value, the right to work, the protection against Union thuggery. He is FOR right to work but NEVER votes for right to work legislation. He also endorsed Arlen Specter in his 1996 Presidential run, in 2004 against true conservative Pat Toomey, AND even endorsed Mitt Romney in his 2008 Presidential run. Well, worse than even his right to vote betrayal and his endorsements of RINOS and future democrats was the work that he did as a Senator in the Clinton years, when he and Trent Lott undermined the Senate efforts to bring Bill Clinton to trial after the House impeached him for lying under oath.
Thats right, this pure conservative, who attacks like a tiny lap dog (see Thursdays debate for a classic example of what an attack lap dog looks like when he nips at the heels of others), was instrumental, along with Trent Lott, in stopping the Clinton Impeachmment proceeedings, in rescuing Bill Clinton from facing a fair trial of his peers. This action should not be surprising to the people who remember how aggressively Rick Santorum worked to torpedo a true conservative, Pat Toomey, in 2004, from removing a future democrat and former RINO, Arlen Specter.
Here is all the proof you need to see that Santorum, in fact, killled the impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton, just another reflection of how Santorum is the face of Conservative Purity in Name Only (CPINO- which also sounds like the name of an exotic small wolf dop that yips and yips and yips at everyone ankles):....
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomist.com ...
Posting the truth about Santorum is not petty. I doubt he is home long enough to put his feet on the table.
speaking of shallow..i didnt call it a smear...i responded to someone else calling it a romney smear machine attack and said we maybe its newt ...i was blasting someone else blindness and knee jerk reaction and get yours...check out the thread and see what is being responded to..ok?..as for mister rogen..it seems like every one who was there has a different point of view as to what the truth is..to pick one that you like...is rather...shallow
I have NO clue why you would ask such questions. Of course I will vote. Now what is 'funny' are all these 'prayer' requests for 'saint' Rick because he is the 'holiest' of the candidates.... Wonder do people really think God is deaf, dumb, and blind... do they not know He keeps the perfect record on who does what and says otherwise????
Actually Sanctimonium’s lifetime rating is 88.1.
Facts and links can be your friend:
http://www.conservative.org/ratings/ratingsarchive/2006/2006senate.htm
Then I guess I don't know what propaganda is after all these years or=f reading Pravda and I still don't get it.
You want to blame someone for the lack of conviction? How about you blame every Senator who took an entirely new oath to set on the court, then proceeded to break that oath as quick as they could get in from of a camera. How about saving a little wrath for the idiot Supreme Court Justice that had no clue that he was the actual President of the Senate during the trial, sense he had to ask permission from the Senate Rules/historian person before proceeding?
How about figuring out that the democrats made the impeachment all about sex, when it was about lying under oath to a Federal Court Judge and obstruction of Justice.
If you had a clue what propaganda was, you would know that SEX,SES, SEX was the meme of the snakehead and it worked well because the people bought it and the Senate used it as an escape hatch.
Nah...from the looks of your posting history, YOU are the smear Newt machine. BTW, I've been wondering...are you the "skaterboy" in the commercial about "I'm a skater, I'm a mormon"??
You are correct, JR has endorsed, IMHO early. The admins however, and to their credit, have not treated Santorum supporters like they do Romneybots or Paulistas. Many Newt supporters in our “family” do not have these manners.
So now we have Newt, the wife swapper and Freddy-Fanny hustler; Mitt the pro abortion Obamneycare creator; and Rick the big spender, conservative offender, oh, and don’t forget Ron, the nutty old grandpa hell bent on “gettin’ out of W A R, get us out of this W A R posture”... hell, I give up, gunna hang my head and just sing... O-b-a-m-a, OK! (to the tune of Oklahoma)
You are correct, JR has endorsed, IMHO early. The admins however, and to their credit, have not treated Santorum supporters like they do Romneybots or Paulistas. Many Newt supporters in our “family” do not have these manners.
Santorum is NOT conservative on many issues including spending.
Santorum is NOT conservative on many issues including spending.
I will take his word over the stuff on your home page, looks like red meat stuff posted there to defray curious freepers who may doubt your conservative creds. I doubt you really believe any of it. Feel free to prove every word is true if you can.
I thought JR did support Newt.
He also stated that IF Romney wins the nomination, some on FR will be anti Romney, some will be anti Obama.
It’s his site so I darn well will live with that. I’ll vote for any republican against Obama.
IMHO Newt is fading a bit now, Santorum coming on strong. It probably all equals a Romney nomination but who knows.
I wouldn’t mind the convention picking some new conservative candidate, I believe the country mainly wants to replace Obama.
75 posted on Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:53:06 PM by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate) speaking of shallow..i didnt call it a smear...i responded to someone else calling it a romney smear machine attack and said we maybe its newt ...i was blasting someone else blindness and knee jerk reaction and get yours...check out the thread and see what is being responded to..ok?..as for mister rogen..it seems like every one who was there has a different point of view as to what the truth is..to pick one that you like...is rather...shallow
You just repeated the very thing I read in your first post. Look who is throwing the sewage.
Mr. Rogan was/is an American Patriot, Santorum is a happy helper to further his own political career.
true conservative Pat Toomey
Since when is voting for fags in the military a conservative issue. Funny how everytime I bring this up it gets ignored because nobody wants to see how right Santorum was.
Well I am off the hook then because I am going to vote.See tagline
I’ll agree that none of these were my first, second or third choice. My first wears skirts and glasses.
You don't hear that from me. I'm holding out for a brokered convention.
But I will take Santorum over Romney.
Surely you are NOT attempting to claim that the comic Spector of 'Scottish Law' was opposed to fags in the military? Santorum was the moderates useful rag doing the Alinsky upon 'conservatives'. He is what he is and he is not nearly the image of perfection so many attempt to project.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.