Skip to comments.
Sharon Angle Endorses Santorum
National Review Online ^
| 02-01-2012
| Robert Costa
Posted on 02/01/2012 7:20:35 PM PST by parksstp
Sharron Angle, a Nevada Republican and tea-party favorite, will endorse Rick Santorum. She issued the following statement to National Review Online:
Rick Santorum and I have known each other for years. He is a strong fiscal and social conservative who stands on principles above politics. He has never wavered in his support for family values understanding the impact that strong families have on a prosperous economy. His continuous opposition to Amnesty, Obamacare, the bail-outs, and cap and trade are a perfect fit with our main street Tea Party movement.
Angle was the Nevada GOPs nominee for U.S. Senate in 2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; nevada; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: parksstp
oh wow. about as exciting as rick himself
41
posted on
02/02/2012 3:56:06 AM PST
by
Reagan69
(I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
To: Flycatcher
Apparently, he's learned well from his mentor, Romney.
Sorry children, that progressive tactic has worn pretty thin. So do you have the manhood to admit that all those people who were working for Romney are now endorsing Gingrich? LOL
42
posted on
02/02/2012 4:42:43 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Williams
Most here hate LG so how is this being received?
With the same courage they faced Newt's open borders, big government policies, and all the secret Romney employees endorsing him. By looking the other way and hoping nobody notices the hypocrisy.
43
posted on
02/02/2012 4:46:52 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: AnTiw1
I was thinking more of Mittens & Newt not attacking Rick.
At least I have not seen any news items of such.
44
posted on
02/02/2012 7:33:42 AM PST
by
entropy12
(Socialism has failed everywhere tried. It breeds mediocrity, corruption, nepotism & poverty for all)
To: JSteff
The HECK it was slanted. Your last sentence says it all: Graham was his normal RINO weasel self. I stand by everything I saw and heard.
Why should I post the entire text? Because you decided to gloss over part of that sneaky little wimp’s words? Sorry, not playing. Of course Graham said he appreciated him, but I maintain that “Newt is a danger to himself and others, but so is Obama” is hardly an “endorsement.” Or perhaps it is the kind one can expect from Graham, whose buddy McCain endorsed Romney and who needs to tread lightly since Newt won SC.
And as for “what were you hoping to gain?”-——before you go off on a tangent, I invite you to check my posting history.
To: cripplecreek
I'm not sure I understand your post, Cripplecreek. But I like you, and don't want to get in a flame war over Gingrich vs Santorum with you.
Reread my posts #29 and #31. I agree that Santorum and Gingrich are the only two conservatives in this race, as the ACU ratings can attest.
So what is my beef with Santorum? Again, the enemy is Romney and Obama. When Gingrich or Santorum attack these two statists, I will applaud (as I've done for Santorum). But Gingrich has never run a negative ad against Santorum. Santorum, though, is now going scorched-earth negative against Gingrich in ads running in Colorado and Nevada.
As I said before, why the hell is Santorum doing this? That is what I meant by my post #8 -- the Romney mentor comment. Romney can only win by going negative, and that is what Santorum seems to have learned from Florida from Romney: go negative against Newt.
It's disheartening, and just so you know where I stand, if Newt went scorched-earth negative against Santorum in these primary races, I would be equally as angry with him too.
46
posted on
02/02/2012 8:02:53 AM PST
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: cripplecreek; Flycatcher
Hey, I gotta run and buy some decking material, so I won't be around for several hours.
I'll be sure to answer any replies then.
47
posted on
02/02/2012 8:14:33 AM PST
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: jmax
Thanks so much for ordering “Harry: Money Mob & Influence”. The investigation still goes on, a lot of the interviews still left hanging are literally with murderers or people who have been involved with kidnapping, bribery, the mob. It hasn’t been easy following the trail, so every bit of support helps. I hope you enjoy it.
Watch the movie Casino as backup material, I’m essentially filling in Harry’s part. Casino is 85% plus real, so you will see what I’m up against.
48
posted on
02/03/2012 3:45:19 PM PST
by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
" How is Rick Santorum being a conservative, by not supporting and by not endorsing Pat Toomeys first run for Pennsylvania U.S. Senate? "
How many times are we going to hear this propaganda crap here on Free Republic ?
Answer this question ?
How is Pat Toomey being a conservative by supporting the repeal of the ban in the military of Don't Ask, Don' tell ? and how is Toomey being a conservative who voted to repeal the ban in the military of sodomy and bestiality ? answer those 2 questions.
To: Cicero
The Newt supporters still have not gave me a answer of how can Pat Toomey being a conservative support the repeal of the ban in the military of Don’t Ask, Don’t tell, and voted on the repeal of the ban in the military of sodomy and bestiality.... I never have gotten a answer back from he Newt support of this... I wonder why ? perhaps ? if they repeat a lie often enough people will believe it.
To: TexasFreeper2009
" What I want to know is if the frothy Santorum has gotten the endorsement of Arlen Spector? "
So the Newt supporters are for the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell ? or the repeal of the ban in the military of sodomy and bestiality in the military ? because you guy's supported Pat Toomey... as far as the Newt supporter's logic is concerned.
To: cripplecreek
" that progressive tactic has worn pretty thin. So do you have the manhood to admit that all those people who were working for Romney are now endorsing Gingrich? "
That's a good line....
Yeah, Trump was going to endorse Newt then figured Newt is going to lose because of his huge negatives..
Actually ? Newt is staying in so Santorum won't have a chance to beat Romney.. there are some who are saying that Santorum has a good chance to even beat Romney in the midwest.... Nevada, Colorado, Mo...
Yeah what happen to all the bravado that Newt was going to beat Romney in Florida ? opps, didn't happen.
To: bksanders
" History will show Rick Santorum's candidacy for what it us
counterproductive at best, senseless in reality. "
History will show that all this is is people's own opinions , and those opinions stink... what ? Newt win Florida ? yeah, that's all we heard here on FR, but ? Newt lost in Florida.
To: American Constitutionalist
You sir are correct on all counts
54
posted on
02/03/2012 11:25:24 PM PST
by
bksanders
(Old Gets Older the Older I Get)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson