Posted on 01/29/2012 10:40:15 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Though we’ll not know the outcome of the Georgia hearing regarding ballot eligibility for the nation’s number 1 undocumented worker until the first part of February, Barack Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid, shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.
One day prior to the scheduled hearing before Administrative Judge Michael Malihi, Obama attorney Michael Jablonski addressed both a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp AND an email, directed to the Secretary via one of the court’s hearing officers, asking Kemp to cancel the hearing.
Georgia law allows “any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” to file an objection to that candidate’s inclusion on the State ballot. (1)
Such objection filings go to the Secretary of State who makes a determination to either overrule or pass them along to the State Administrative Court for disposition.
Michael Malihi was the Administrative Judge to whom a number of these objections were directed by the Secretary and he found them worthy of pursuing in court.
The dozens of similar suits questioning Obama’s eligibility, filed in other venues around the nation were dismissed because the plaintiffs “lacked standing”—that is, were unable to prove direct, personal damage if Obama were to be permitted to remain in or run again for the office he holds.
But Georgia law trumped that defense, throwing Obama and Jablonski into uncharted waters. And forced to follow the new tack of actually having to lawfully and properly PROVE Obama’s eligibility, in the weeks since the original filing, Jablonski had pretty much emptied his quiver on behalf of the acting president.
On January 3rd his motion for an outright dismissal of the lawsuits was denied by Judge Malihi.
And on Friday the 20th, his motion to quash subpoenas...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
“I doubt it will go as far as the U.S. Supreme Court. I suspect if the Georgia SOS rules against the Obot, the cat is out of the bag. Obama will be forced to resign by his own party by this summer or sooner.”
From your keyboard to God’s inbox. . .
The SCOTUS should just block out his so-called black half and rule for the white half if it makes them feel better. A fraud and crook is a fraud and crook no matter what color they are. Justice is supposed to be blind especially at that level.
wintertime says: “Shame on Rush, Levin, Hannity, and the other so-called yappers for ignoring this!”
Amen! I hear considerable conservative blustering about Obama’s philosophies, which are obviously unAmerican but never really referenced as such in national media. Newt talks about Saul Alinsky, Beck discusses socialism, and Rush and Hannity slather it on with similar references.
But none of them are willing to address the root issue - WHY Obama was not raised to appreciate American culture, but rather to rebel and fight against it. It is exactly this kind of foreign influence which the Framers intended to preclude from the US Presidency by requiring “natural born Citizen” status.
But the national media, even the conservative wing of that industry, finds the subject taboo, even to the point of ignoring the fact that, as of 01/26/2012, a state court in Georgia has finally accepted testimony and evidence in a legitimate complaint that Barack Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as POTUS.
This event should have opened up a full discussion of the issue in the media, but instead we find a virtual syndicated news blackout. Even Drudge only carried a small blurb about it for a couple of hours, then - poof! - gone. Someone mentions Obama’s Indonesian upbringing on Hannity recently and he shuts it down to avoid “...getting me in trouble.”
My belief is that a treacherous deal was struck when then-Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton signed off on Senate Resolution 511, a non-binding agreement accepting John McCain as a natural born citizen, even though he was not born on US soil, because his parents (plural) were US citizens upon his birth. From that moment on, I believe Obama’s illegitimacy was off limits.
What’s the down side of breeching that contract at this point? It must be formidable to keep this issue in check for so long.
SO, then, what’s the downside of keeping the agreement? It seems to me that Republicans and Democrats have conspired in this matter to the ruination of the Constitution, no less.
What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility to we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.
I wonder: Are we up to it?
Besides, the WND stories say he offered a default judgment but the plaintiffs REJECTED it. They thought it more important to get their evidence on the record. I don't think a default judgment is automatic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.