Marginal futility ping.
Sick-o. I didn’t realize John Maynard Keynes was basically a closet Nazi.
You’d think Libs would disown him, but they must be desperate for support, trying to rub shoulders with dead racists like Margaret Sanger and John Maynard Keynes.
Keynes sounds like he was a progressive.
I say we dig him up and kick his ass.
Without lies, the left is nowhere
What does Keynes antisemitism have to do with the validity of his economic theory? Most people were antisemitic in those days.
Krugman says that Keynes was right? Nice to see that ol’ Paul continues to bat 1.000.
He was much worse than an anti-Semite. He was a homosexual who staged orgies with his homosexual friends and passed around the boys. Exactly like the SS Brownshirts of Hitler-—who used the Hitler Youth for sex. Hitler put known pederasts in charge of the boys.
See a pattern????? It is like Sandusky was doing-—who do you think the Professors and Judges and Lawyers, and politicians were in his big group-—the Second Mile was passing boys around to powerful men.
Here’s more info on the sick Keynes who perverts adore:
“Keynes and his conspirators projected homosexuality and drug addiction as an intrinsic part of their collectivist society of the future. His male sweetheart, Lytton Strachey, wrote privately that they would corrupt the whole population, “subtly, through literature, into the bloodstream of the people, and in such a way that they accepted it all naturally, if need be without at first realizing what it was to which they were agreeing.” He boasted that he intended “to seduce his readers to tolerance through laughter and sheer entertainment.” He pointed out that the object was “to write in a way that would contribute to an eventual change in our ethical and sexual mores - a change that couldn’t be done in a minute, but would unobtrusively permeate the more flexible minds of young people.” J. M. Keynes put it in the terms of Marxist economics:
More from the sick mind of Keynes-—all you people who have swallowed the homosexual Koolaid:
“When the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there will be great changes in the code of morals. We shall be able to rid ourselves of many pseudo-moral principles which have hagridden us for two hundred years....”
Rid the Western World of Christian morality==that religion which put pederasty and homosexuality in the closet (for a reason)——NOW, boys will once again be fair game like in Ancient Greece and today’s Afghanistan.
Anyone pro-homosexual rights?-—it is all about getting the boys. You are for sick, immoral use of boys. Child abuse. Simply evil.
Much more about this Fabian Socialist-—John Dewey—Father of our Education system was also a Fabian Socialist-—see a pattern yet???????
The Fabian socialists used the writings of Ellis as a wedge for sex education in the schools. They started in the colleges and gradually eased into the high school level. Ellis complained to his fellow socialists fifty-five years ago that he found wider acceptance for his books in the United States than he did in England. In fact, he was arrested and tried for obscenity in England, whereas his books were sold here without serious interference by the authorities. Today, his perversions are standard reference material for the sex educators, and Havelock Ellis is popularly called “the father of social psychology.”
Read more and puke-—and see what is in your child’s schools to pervert and confuse them and flip their worldview into a Satanic Occult one:
http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/keynes.htm
Typical person of the left.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Keynes displayed antisemitic tendencies in some of his writings dating to his teens. He was a privledged, upper class academic in a country with a nearly milenia long history of antisemitism. That Keynes shared or accepted those views should be no surprise. To my knowledge that aspect of his mindset wasn't significant in his important writings. And in late 19th, early 20th century Europe an economist with virulent antisemitic views could easily go off on that tangent. His "tendencies" were part of the times.