It is insane and immoral... (Liberal Barf Alert)

Progressives for Ron Paul ^

[mnehring]

It is insane and immoral...

if we allow the Republican party to nominate anyone other than Ron Paul or Jon Huntsman.

Huffington Post, The Nation, Mother Jones, The Progressive, Countdown, TRMS, FSTV, and all other liberal news and commentary media need to advocate immediately for the massive infiltration of the GOP primaries and caucuses by progressives and liberals in every  party and every state.

No more excuses!

[mnehring]

Just a view from the 'progressive' left.

[EagleUSA]

The radical, out-of-touch, one-way liberals in action again.
Trying to write history way before it happens — thinking they can do that. They do keep trying.

Kinda like the libs economic recovery we are in — which is just “taking a little more time than we thought”.

(sound of barf hitting keyboard...)

[Jukeman]

We may be approaching a civil war in this country. Strike that. We are now in a civil war and it is going to get much more uncivil. And it may be just about time for such.

[hosepipe]

If they had any sense they wouldn’t be democrats..

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Two can play that game.

[CainConservative]

The left would be just as happy WITH WILLARD.

[mnehring]

The left doesn’t have a primary of their own so the only thing they have to do with all their time and resources is jack with our primary.

We went from having a lot of potential in our primary to being a complete cluster.

[hinckley buzzard]

I suspect this reflects the republican penchant for open primaries. The beltway scum who control the national party know they are on life support if not for outside leftwing support.

[Yardstick]

Does he forget that Ron Paul would have a domestic policy? Paul would instantly start hacking away at the libs’ beloved nanny state with a meat cleaver. By day two of a Ron Paul administration, the left would be denouncing him as immoral.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

We went from having a lot of potential in our primary to being a complete cluster.

Maybe they are unintentionally setting the stage for a brokered convention.

That would be sweet.

[mnehring]

A brokered convention would be a nighmare. Look who does the brokering, the delegates and their ‘handlers’- all establishment. A brokered convention would be the most insider, moderate candidate they could come up with.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A brokered convention would be the most insider, moderate candidate they could come up with.

A brokered convention would mean the insiders have lost control of the situation.

[sauropod]

Way to spoil my appetite!

[RightGeek]

Sounds like a George Soros/David Axelrod operation

[Popman]

if we allow the Republican party to nominate

If we allow...WTF....

Thanks for letting us know we need your permission to nominate who we want

Gee, if you want to dictate who will be the GOP nominee, switch parties and vote in our primaries....Oh' wait you already do that...

[morphing libertarian]

Perhaps they should start a third party and find a natural born citizen to run.

[iacovatx]

Yes, you are already at odds with an ideology that will never leave good people alone. The opposition is best described as an ideology grounded in a combination of greed and self-centered indulgence. The conflict is one of information, not arms. They control much of the public information system and that is a formidable weapon. However, they have an Achilles heel—they have an insatiable greed that has almost consumed them. If they could be walled off from conservatives and allowed to manage their own debt and revenue system, they might collapse as has Greece. Doesn’t matter whether they collapse or thrive, however, just so long as their ideology and the resulting coercive and confiscatory greed no longer oppresses us conservatives. Perhaps we could have a sign-up system by which Americans could officially join the liberal sub-nation or remain with the conservative, traditional USA. The liberals’ programs and debts could go with them and they could deliriously tax each other into a coma, apply affirmative action to give superpowers to members of “special” groups, and erase human rights such as religious practice, self-defense, and property rights to replace them with collective welfare and “good vibes”.

[ExCTCitizen]

Lets see, the left wants RuPaul or Huntsman to win? Ok, now I kno I don’t want them (never did before either)

[chris_bdba]

Yes that is the up side to Paul he would demolish the welfare state.IMHO even though his foreign policy is a night mare...could he really do any worse than what we have now? No I am NOT a Paul supporters but they better be careful what they wish for....