Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NO Place Safe to Hide Anymore: Introducing the USAF's GBU-57A/B 'Massive Ordinance Penetrator' (MOP)
Reaganite Republican ^ | December 20, 2011 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 12/20/2011 8:59:31 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

10x more powerful than it's predecessor, 
the 30,000 pound bomb can penetrate 200 ft 
of hardened concrete before it goes BOOM
GBU-57A/B 

Military technology has indeed created some fearsome weapons over the last few decades, from the 5,000 lb GBU-28 Deep Throat bunker buster, to the 3x larger (15,000 lb) BLU-82 Daisycutter, roughly equivalent to the Russians' 15,650 lb ATBIP (Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power). Then there's the USAF's 22,000 lb Grand Slam 'earthquake bomb' and the 22,600 lb GBU-43 MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Blast), which approximates the effect of a small nuclear weapon.

But provided you were able to find shelter under -say- 150 ft. of hardened concrete, none of them were going to bother you too much. Alas, a new Boeing-produced mega-bomb has as of now altered that equation dramatically...

Just last month the USAF took delivery of the first precision-guided GBU-57A/B (Massive Ordnance Penetrator).
 
The freaking thing weighs fifteen tons and will penetrate 200 ft of hardened concrete before exploding deep underground- right on top of the target.

Perhaps the first impression of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator is really how simple it looks...  it's just BIG and accurate, with a real hard point made of a special high performance steel alloy:

This weapon is intended for just one specific purpose: to destroy the type of hardened concrete bunkers which house central command facilities, enemy leadership rat-holes, and weapons of mass destruction... and to do so without resorting to any sort of nuclear weaponry.

Understandably, the MOP development program has been accelerated in recent years as concern regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions has grown- now it's ready, and just in time.

The MOP is deployed from high altitude and allows gravity to add momentum to its 30,000 pound weight so that it hits with enormous kinetic energy. The explosive power delivered is indeed 10x more powerful than it's predecessor, the BL-109.

Put simply, the MOP hits exactly where it is intended to hit with sufficient force to bury itself 200+ feet into hardened concrete... where it explodes its 5,300 pound warhead.

The MOP is designed to be carried aboard B-2s and  B-52 bombers- but the most likely platform to be employed in delivering the MOP is the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, some of which have already been modified to carry two of the 14-metric-ton bombs...

The stealth bomber's features find plenty of synergies with the new weapon, too: the mostly composite B-2 has dramatically reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures, extraordinary aerodynamic efficiency, a long range (6000 miles) without refueling ... and a massive payload. It is hence a potent delivery system for the new MOP, as it is very difficult for defensive systems to detect, track and engage. 
And when it gets there with a couple of these suckers... oh, man.
Considering America's unlimited global aerial refueling capabilities, there is truly nowhere to hide anymore- all we need is leadership with the will and just cause.

____________________________________________________________

Global Security.org   Defense Industry Daily   h/t Speedunque  Wikipedia


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: iran; moab; mop; ragheadremover; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2011 8:59:36 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Homeland Security is arranging a grant for the Detroit PD to obtain two of these.


2 posted on 12/20/2011 9:05:12 AM PST by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


3 posted on 12/20/2011 9:06:31 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

200 feet of concrete? BS. Maybe 200 feet of a concrete structure with hardened concrete outer walls.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 9:07:25 AM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

Why NOT, they’ve already got tanks!


5 posted on 12/20/2011 9:09:01 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
Hmmm;)

Israel-US to hold largest-ever missile defense drill

6 posted on 12/20/2011 9:13:15 AM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

I could see a combination of a 15 ton penetrator 600 mph “drilling” action, initial detonation shock and pressure putting destructive heat and pressure through cracks on the far side of 200 feet of concrete.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 9:17:43 AM PST by SENTINEL (Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Pretty bad ass.


8 posted on 12/20/2011 9:24:28 AM PST by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

How long until McLame teams up with obastard to cancel this program as “unnecessary” ala the F22?


9 posted on 12/20/2011 9:24:39 AM PST by piytar (The Obama Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

Even better would be a series of these...one after another...each is electronically locked on to the previous one...first couple will soften up the impact site ...


10 posted on 12/20/2011 9:26:48 AM PST by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I remember the first time they used a MOAB in iraq, the british media was initially reporting “the crazy yanks actually did it, THEY NUKED IRAQ!”

I laughed about that for days.


11 posted on 12/20/2011 9:29:29 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

To quote a line from the movie “Blue Thunder”: “...and that’s one helluva sh!tstorm in anyone’s language!”


12 posted on 12/20/2011 9:30:45 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

To quote a line from the movie “Blue Thunder”: “...and that’s one helluva sh!tstorm in anyone’s language!”


13 posted on 12/20/2011 9:31:48 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

i wonder what its terminal velocity is.

600mph sounds pretty fast, thats closing in on the speed of sound. can gravity accelerate an object faster than sound within a 60,000 foot drop? got any math wizards on board here? 32feet per second per second?


14 posted on 12/20/2011 9:34:17 AM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

intersting website to calc terminal velocity. took a guess at some numbers and came up with 527mph from 60,000 feet

http://www.calctool.org/CALC/eng/aerospace/terminal


15 posted on 12/20/2011 9:37:23 AM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

To quote a line from the movie “Blue Thunder”: “...and that’s one helluva sh!tstorm in anyone’s language!”


16 posted on 12/20/2011 9:41:11 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

I assumed 600mph forward release velocity, and enough wind resistance to conservatively thwart any additional acceleration as it approaches the speed of sound.


17 posted on 12/20/2011 9:42:52 AM PST by SENTINEL (Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

Sorry for the triplicate post....something weird going on w/either my laptop or FR today.:/


18 posted on 12/20/2011 9:43:26 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Without any accelaration behind it, your terminal velocity is about 122 mph


19 posted on 12/20/2011 9:47:37 AM PST by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Just in time for Christmas. Christmas in Iran, that is.


20 posted on 12/20/2011 9:48:42 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson