You are pretty much misrepresenting his positions.
no those ARE his positions.
Ron Paul doesn’t need anyone to “misrepresent” his positions.
No amount of spin from Paul’s bizarre little supporters is going to change the fact that he is more aligned with the left than he is with the right, that he’s a blatant hypocrite and that he openly assoicates with or supports groups such as Code Pink, Infowars and OWS.
rokkitapps
Since Apr 5, 2011
I have great news!!!!!!!!!!
There aren’t all that many Paulnuts on FR, so you folks will be able to carpool yourselves back to your mental institutions.
See.... I told you that it was great news. LOL @ you folks.
FR is, for the most part, hostile to Paul. Support him and the shills come running.
Just a friendly warning, they've locked off the site.
If you persists and try to discuss the complexitites of Pauls economic arguments, the global effect of a strong American economy and a small federal government to reduce warfare and belligerency worldwide through economic dominance, these shills will not play - because they well know they'll get beat soundly.
If you want to talk about Paul's decades-long dedication to protecting constitutional freedoms, these "conservatives" will instantly sound like DU slanderers, foul-mouthing threads until they die.
And of course, the background chant of crazy, crazy, crazy will be kept up, to make sure no discussion takes place at all - especially concerning Paul's support for limited and appropriate use of our armed forces to save military lives, limit military spending, and accomplish discrete and verifiable goals to a country run by the people, and not the government or military.
My advice - don't fight it. Watch it. Contemplate it carefully.
Learn.
He has said that we angered AQ into attacking us. That’s not debatable. What has he said he would do about AQ?
“You are pretty much misrepresenting his positions.”
Welcome to an FR Ron Paul thread!!!
Truth, decency, and maturity are the first things to go out the window.
No, you are the one who refuses to admit his positions. There, fixed it.
Ok. So what are Ron Paul's positions on 9/11 and national defense?
RoPaul is the only one of the Republican candidates I would not vote for against Obama. (Thankfully, Paul has zero chance of being the nominee.) I agree with him on eliminating unconstitutional federal programs such as the Department of Education and ending the welfare state. On that, he’s right. However, when it comes to foreign policy and national security, Ron Paul is nuts and naive. He actually would be more dangerous to our country than Obama, and national security is the #1 reason we have a federal government in the first place.
I am not basing my opinions on Ron Paul on what has been said *about* him. I am basing my opinions on Ron Paul on what I have heard come out of his own mouth.
Ron Paul fails to recognize militant Islam as the #1 threat to all civilized nations around the world and to the United States in particular. He is naive about Iran. He is living in a dream world. He excuses acts of terrorism committed against the United States—in that respect, he is no better than Jeremiah Wright.
Ron Paul is absolutely, utterly, disqualified from my consideration as a candidate. And I say this, even though I agree with him on getting rid of most of the bloated federal Leviathan—but even there, he is highly unrealistic in thinking that could be done overnight.
When he’s at these debates, rambling away, impassioned yet incoherent, he reminds me of the crazy uncle you’ve got living upstairs, but somehow he gets downstairs and embarrasses the heck out of the family at the dinner party.