Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: We were right, Obama GAVE Iran the Drone!
Con Underground ^ | 12/10/2011

Posted on 12/09/2011 10:24:21 PM PST by Just4Him

A couple of days ago Conunderground.com was the first to point out that the circumstances surrounding the “crash” of the top secret RQ170 Sentinel drone simply didn’t add up. And we were tight! The story continues to develop and it doesn’t look good!

To recap, first we were told that Iran might’ve shot it down and then the story changed to “the drone crashed on Iranian soil ”

After realizing that the Iranians were about to parade a perfectly functional drone with nary a scratch on it, the official story changed to “the drone landed because it wants to live” I kid you not that is the official story!

The flack we caught for running the story was typical of the the kind of BS spewed by Obama’s supporters but none the less I didn’t withdraw the story because the official version simply didn’t add up.

The immediate and obvious questions were these: 1) Why didn’t we try to recover the drone? 2) In lieu of a rescue effort why didn’t we bomb it into oblivion? Apparently there was third option and Onama struk that down also.

THE ANSWERS WILL SHOCK YOU – or maybe not. Fox News National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin reported that apparently the Pentagon pleaded with Barrack Hussein Obama to give the order to do just that. The Pentagon initially wanted to send a special forces team to recover the drone. Obama shot down that suggestion. Then the Pentagon offered up plan B , blow it to kingdom come. Obama refused that too and now Iran and China have a brand spanking new fully functional top secret US RQ 170 Sentinel Drone.

The Drone was not recovered or destroyed specifically per Obama’s orders


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: brainlessjoebiden; dnc4iran; dncassettransfer; dncrico; dnctreason; dncvsamerica; drone; drones; iran; iraq; islamisfascism; islamofascism; kenyanbornmuzzie; lebanon; obama457states; obama4iran; obama4mullahs; obamanation; shadowwars; threatmatrix; typicaltreason; yemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: WackySam

I agree with you on that. All this technology and there is no mechanisms to remotely destroy it? Sounds like a design flaw!


21 posted on 12/09/2011 10:53:14 PM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Whomever would do that would find their career and pensions gone in a hurry.

You’re going to hear a lot of stories in 2013 about what Obama and the Dems and others did since 2008.


22 posted on 12/09/2011 10:53:38 PM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, than he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him
Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic
23 posted on 12/09/2011 10:58:33 PM PST by MtnMan101 (THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classified

Not a flaw. I think, if it’s recoverable, they don’t destroy it. But if it is not recoverable, then it’s destroyed remotely.

Somebody gave the military an order to not destroy an unrecoverable drone.


24 posted on 12/09/2011 10:59:47 PM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, than he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him
Obama shot down that suggestion.
Obama refused that too...

Does Obiwannabe just run around yelling out irrational orders or does he need to give some semblance of a reason for his decisions?

That's what this piece makes it sound like.

Then again,maybe that's exactly what he does do.

25 posted on 12/09/2011 11:00:33 PM PST by mitch5501 (My guitar wants to kill your momma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

I believe certain important people have been told not to cross the line or their families will be in danger.

George Bush should have exposed 0bama back in 2007.

New World Order/One World Government is the name of the game.


26 posted on 12/09/2011 11:03:23 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Thank you!


27 posted on 12/09/2011 11:09:05 PM PST by Just4Him (The truth shall set you free. John 8:32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

None of this makes sense from any angle.

Least of all the numerous obviously bogus explanations which are just a slap at voters’ intelligence ... tell them anything, they aren’t that smart ... seems to be Obama and company’s attitude.


28 posted on 12/09/2011 11:11:40 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

You’re welcome, Just4Him. I’ve caught a lot of flack for saying that in the past. I stand by it. We’re in wicked times and Evil dwells in the White House and elsewhere.


29 posted on 12/09/2011 11:13:13 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

What happened to the “It’s a fake” meme? I will say it seemed odd that the Iranian display completely concealed the undercarriage. ( I don’t recall seeing this mentioned, although I’m sure somebody must have done so. )


30 posted on 12/09/2011 11:13:36 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

It is unbelievable that a device such as this did not have a device on board which would self destruct either on impact or by remote control. But with all the other stupid things our government is doing including the EPA it would come as no surprise. Any one even with only a high school education would have to take such an incident in to account that sooner or later such a high tech device may fall in to enemy’s hands and needs to be destroyed. Unless of course it was designed as a “Trojan Horse” but I am not so sure our government has the capacity of such a brilliant thought. The Israelis may be, our government I doubt it.


31 posted on 12/09/2011 11:14:39 PM PST by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
Where is a General like Jack D. Ripper when you need him.


32 posted on 12/09/2011 11:16:52 PM PST by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unkus

And if one of those people so threatened just came out with it and said “screw it, do your worst to us, we’re ready to meet our lord!” and spoke out in a public forum, they would pretty much have to carry out the threat in public as well. That could be the trigger to bigger things. But who has the courage to bait them that way?


33 posted on 12/09/2011 11:18:51 PM PST by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: saintgermaine

Good points. Another thing” I should be SOP - standard operating proceedure to destroy any high tech weapons system that would fall int the hands of an enemy. One of the smart bombs (JDAMS) would have done that.


34 posted on 12/09/2011 11:19:06 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

The following is all merely wild speculation on my part.

During WW2 Churchill had the code breakers at Bletchly Park.
(The goose that lay the golden eggs and never cackled)

It was called Ultra and gave the British access to German morse traffic that was encrypted using the Enigma Cypher machines.

Before they could take action based on the decrypts they often had to send out a scout plane to spot a target such as German submarine wolf packs. This was so the Germans would have a plausible explanation for how the British had gathered the information. Otherwise they would have known that Britain had discovered a way to read their top secret radio traffic.

It is quite possible that we send drones out on missions for much the same reason. We may have much more advanced technical means to gather data. The drones would thus allow other nations to believe we were getting the information from the drone fly overs.

The drones may just be a cover story to deflect speculation about something much more amazing. And a captured drone could be a great way to mislead an adversary as to our technical level. We could get them to believe all sorts of nonsense based on what they discovered in the drone.


35 posted on 12/09/2011 11:19:24 PM PST by Bobalu (even Jesus knew the poor would always be with us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
That drone is inherently unstable due to design. Although a pilot on the ground is “flying it” its inherent aerodynamic instability requires an on board computer to keep it stable.

If the drone displayed by Iran is the real thing, this begs two questions.
1. Did someone on “our side” land it in Iran on purpose?
2. Did Iran land it because they knew how to control and fly the drone. If that is the case, how in the hell did they get that info?

36 posted on 12/09/2011 11:19:45 PM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
None of this makes sense from any angle.

Actually it makes perfect sense in consideration of the long term plans of those behind Obama.

37 posted on 12/09/2011 11:19:51 PM PST by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

When is he going to be arrested and tried for treason?


38 posted on 12/09/2011 11:20:08 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

We don’t need enemies, we have OBAMA


39 posted on 12/09/2011 11:20:48 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coydog

And if one of those people so threatened just came out with it and said “screw it, do your worst to us, we’re ready to meet our lord!” and spoke out in a public forum, they would pretty much have to carry out the threat in public as well. That could be the trigger to bigger things. But who has the courage to bait them that way?


Very good points. Yes, bring it out, expose them and dare them.

Satan has many under his spell.

0bama is sooooooo sinister.


40 posted on 12/09/2011 11:22:40 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson