I still think it.
I think she planing to shape the debate without running...it free her to make the message the focus
Yes, well we’ve now “vetted” all of the alternative candidates (okay, Gingrich is still a work in progress) and there’s really no one left standing.
Cain: Fading fast before the revelations today of a 13-year affair; now done for.
Bachmann: Too weird to be President, and precious little experience at governing besides.
Gingrich: More baggage than a fully-loaded 747, all of it well-deserved; he earned it.
Perry: Actually I like him, but not enough others do apparently.
Huntsman: Romney-lite, and he knows it.
Paul: Go ahead nominate him; give the election to Obama.
Santorum: He’d be doing better if he would get that lemon out of his mouth when he talks, but he didn’t and he isn’t.
Johnson: Who?
By the time they’re done “vetting” Gingrich, he’s going to think a colonoscopy is something to look forward to, and we’re going to be out of “anyone-but-Romney” candidates.
So, what the hey? Write in Palin, Iowans. Might as well give her a shot. At least we know all of her faults by now, and won’t have to endure another public colonoscopy of a candidate. Besides, she’s the only anti-crony-capitalist of the bunch, and with a track record that proves it.
If it isn't TOO offensive (i.e., I've been clueless), welcome back!
Cheers!