Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Commander-in-Chief" Debate Recap, Winners and Losers
The Iowa Republican ^ | November 13, 2011 | Kevin Hall

Posted on 11/13/2011 2:25:54 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

For the second time in four days, the GOP presidential candidates took the stage for a debate. This one focused exclusively on foreign policy and national security. The first hour aired live on the CBS network. The final half hour was only available online and the CBS feed was lousy for the first 15 minutes of that. So, most viewers only paid attention to the first hour. This recap covers the entire debate.

Here is a look at how each candidate fared, along with winners and losers:

Michele Bachmann: Once again, the Minnesota congresswoman was in command on the issues and offered plenty of substance. She also failed to stand out, again. Bachmann had a good line about Obama “allowing the ACLU to run the CIA”. Often ignored, she practically begged the moderators for time on two different occasions, but was shot down. Bachmann held her own, but did little to sway voters.

Herman Cain: Without the ability to use “9-9-9” as a crutch, Cain struggled. He provided his answers with a slow, methodical delivery, probably trying to avoid a gaffe. Much like Cain’s stances on social issues, some of his foreign policy answers were indecipherable.

Cain proclaimed, “I do not agree with torture. Period. However, I will trust the judgment of our military leaders to determine what is torture and what is not torture.” Huh?

Six months after officially declaring his candidacy, Cain is still giving the same non-answer on the war in Afghanistan. Cain called Yemen’s corrupt president “our friend”, and still believes we can somehow undermine Iran’s nuclear program by drilling for oil here. Cain received few applause breaks from a lively South Carolina crowd. It was not his best night.

Newt Gingrich: Once again, the former House Speaker commanded the stage better than anyone else. He provided strong, substantive issues. Gingrich projects an aura that he knows the issues better than anyone else. Probably because he does know better. It was another very good performance.

Jon Huntsman: Although I still believe Huntsman is running in the wrong party, this was a very good performance. Unfortunately for the former Utah governor, most GOP primary voters disagree with his stances. However, he provided strong arguments for his views, which include immediately pulling our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and opposing waterboarding. If this were a general election campaign and Huntsman was in his rightful spot as the Democrat, he would have fared very well.

Ron Paul: The Texas congressman’s foreign policy stances are what prevent a lot of Republicans from seriously considering him. As expected, he disagreed with most of the candidates on stage. Paul gave a much better answer regarding Iran’s nuclear program than he did at the Ames debate in August. Although he still opposes going to war to prevent it, Paul said, “If you do, you get a declaration of war and you fight it and you win it.” I thought Paul did a good job presenting his arguments. It seemed like he had very few chances to speak, however.

Rick Perry: After the “Perry Plunge” on Wednesday, I thought his campaign was over. Now, I’m not so sure. This was Rick Perry’s best debate. He was relaxed and provided lots of substance. He scored with the audience by joking about Wednesday’s brain freeze.

Perry gave a terrific answer in regards to foreign aid. “The foreign aid budget in my administration is going to start at $0.” He later added that Pakistan doesn’t deserve any aid and stuck to his answer later in the debate when asked if his $0 policy would include Israel. Perry even got a compliment from Gingrich in regards to his answer. This might signal a rebirth in the Perry campaign.

Mitt Romney: The former Massachusetts governor was his usual polished self. Romney is well versed on every issue and has become an excellent debater. As the presumed frontrunner, Romney handled this debate very well.

Rick Santorum: The former Pennsylvania senator again showed he has a command of the issues. He even disagreed with Newt Gingrich in regards to how to handle Iran’s pending nuclear weapons, but the moderators did not allow the two to argue it out. Calling Pakistan “a friend” probably raised some eyebrows among GOP voters. Santorum was not given a lot of time to shine, which he desperately needs at this point in the campaign.

Overall Winner: Rick Perry. In the aftermath of Wednesday’s gaffe, we have seen a much more human side for Perry. He actually did well in that debate, except for the 53 second brain freeze. Saturday, Perry shined. While he might not have delivered the most style and substance, I believe he helped his campaign more than anyone else. That makes Perry the winner.

Overall Losers: CBS and Herman Cain. Cain avoided any major gaffes, but was clearly the least knowledgeable candidate on the stage. As for CBS, what kind of network only airs an hour of an hour and a half debate? Then encourages people to watch the rest on their website, but provides a feed that pauses every four seconds? Wait. I know the answer. It’s the same kind of network that tried to alter the 2004 presidential race with phony documents.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: debates; foreignpolicy; gopprimary; hermancain; msm; perryastroturfing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last
To: USS Alaska
BTW, you also proved yourself to be an idiot when you took my comment regarding electoral victory ( we want more than Preibus and his crowd delivered ) and construed that to mean candy and various other goodies.

Like that is so off the wall as to be INSULTING.

201 posted on 11/13/2011 12:48:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Just joining in the conversation.


202 posted on 11/13/2011 1:06:58 PM PST by hocndoc (WingRight.org Have mustard seed: Will use. Cut spending, cut spending, cut spending, now,now,now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I agree with the overall assessment that Perry won this one, hands down. Herman Cain was awful. have you noticed that when he doesn’t have a clue for an answer he just restates something from a previous answer and and drawss out his answer with overly precise annunciation?


203 posted on 11/13/2011 1:09:04 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
Perry did answer smoothly, but he didn’t answer the questions. And why did he continually address his answers to Romney?

Good for him! Screw the moderators...especially that smug, arrogant Doogie Howser wannabe, Scott Pelley! Perry should continue doing exactly what he did last night. Use these debates as opportunities to tell the voters what you want them to hear. In case you haven't noticed the moderators of these 'debates' aren't exactly friendly to our conservative candidates!

204 posted on 11/13/2011 1:13:03 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz

No...this post was relentlessly stupid. And an act of sheer desperation. Not fun watching Herman sink, is it?


205 posted on 11/13/2011 1:15:28 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
You are the anti-Perry spammer extraordinaire Liz. Your drive by hit lists and comments are so off the wall and wrong that you have become a joke poster. Who is your candidate Liz? (I really think Liz is more likely a Larry).

I think Liz needs a new hobby...

206 posted on 11/13/2011 1:17:12 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
The reality is that there are only three candidates in the running: Romney, Herman Cain and Gingrich. Because the author and a couple of posters include Gov. Perry, I will throw him in.

Cain's campaign is dead, they just haven't lain down yet. His performance last night was abominable. Without being able to grin and say 9-9-9 he's lost!

207 posted on 11/13/2011 1:19:19 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Just joining in the conversation.


Same as it ever was.


208 posted on 11/13/2011 1:20:26 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
You are accusing others of “spamming” this forum?

Perhaps you're uninformed as to the definition of spamming.

209 posted on 11/13/2011 1:20:30 PM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

You’re right. Not a Perry thread.

Savor the moment ... this may be the only time I ever say that.


210 posted on 11/13/2011 1:28:42 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You became an "idiot" because you read the post as if it had a Marxist slant.

Learn to read English and maybe we can talk.

For a guy that never worked a day in his life, since you put in 38 years as an elite rule writer for the post office, I really don't mind you calling me an idiot.

A snob bureaucrat like yourself, looks at a guy that is beneath his station as an idiot.

Piss off.

211 posted on 11/13/2011 2:26:38 PM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Can you tell me why any conservative should vote for Romney? What policies, positions, ideas, etc. have drawn you to him? What about his stance on abortion? Romneycare? Make a thoughtful, well reasoned argument for him.

Cindie


212 posted on 11/13/2011 3:19:39 PM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

You: “You Perry people have got to stop calling everyone who disagrees with you “a liar.” It’s childish.”

We are not calling someone who disagrees with us a liar.

We are calling someone who is telling lies a liar.

Big difference.


213 posted on 11/13/2011 3:22:23 PM PST by TexMom7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: altura

Altura

He did try - HE DID IT. Planned Parenthood has been officially defunded in the state of Texas thanks to our Governor.

Planned Parenthood has been closing it’s doors to their clinics in many Texas locations.

Thanks for reminding me of that. I love it.


214 posted on 11/13/2011 3:29:07 PM PST by TexMom7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth
Perry's has a lot of work to do to repair perception...

Personally, perceptions notwithstanding; think Perry has a lot of work to do, to repair reality.

Should he win - then ultimately - he has my vote; but my choice is for a more critical observer/player. Credentials that, of all our candidates; only Newt demonstrates consistently.

215 posted on 11/13/2011 6:32:37 PM PST by cricket (Stop the madness. . . Vote the KING out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: TexMom7

He’s also passed tort reform.

What a horrible governor he has been.


216 posted on 11/13/2011 8:08:55 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Seriously? As recent as Feb. 2011 France had an unemployment level of 9.6%.

Have your facts straight if you're going to challenge what was said. France has one of the largest economies in all of Europe. In all of the world, for that matter. Current unemployment is irrelevant. In all due respect.

217 posted on 11/14/2011 7:36:04 AM PST by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone

“And why did he continually address his answers to Romney?”

Maybe he’s trying to “face his demon(s) head-on”. LOL


218 posted on 11/14/2011 8:43:36 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“Cain doesn’t have foreign policy experience. Neither did Barack Obama. He can hardly mess things up worse.”

Not only that, but HC’s motives are pure - he puts America first - and that driving idea will guide him, along with the ability to choose good, knowledgeable, like-minded people - not the anti-semitic, Islamist, marxist progressives that BHO has put in place across the board.


219 posted on 11/14/2011 8:49:18 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I meant stabilizing in terms of his weird outbursts. He could get 4% or zero for all I care.


220 posted on 11/16/2011 2:30:21 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson