Posted on 11/05/2011 2:27:33 PM PDT by JOHN W K
What I find very alarming is our ``conservative`` radio talk show hosts are constantly referring to Herman Cain as a ``conservative``, as if there is an intentional motive by these hosts to convince listeners that Herman Cain is a ``conservative``, when in fact Herman`s 9-9-9 plan is comparable to government enforced central planning on a federal level. And let us not forget how that central planning thing worked out for the ``Union of Soviet Socialist Republics``!
QUESTION:
Why would Mark Levin and other “conservative” talk show hosts constantly call Herman Cain a “conservative” when the evidence of Herman’s political “conservatism” is his 9-9-9 proposal and includes “opportunity zones” which is a proposal for federal “central planning”, big government picking winners and losers; would be an outright assault upon our free market system; is a proposal which violates our founder’s intentions forbidding preferential regulations of commerce to be granted by Congress to any state; blatantly proposes unequal tax law; and obviously ignores that part of our Constitution which requires direct taxes to be apportioned and indirect taxes to be uniform throughout the United States?
Why does Mark Levin call Herman Cain a “conservative” when Herman Cain proposes a further trashing of our Constitution; would enlarge our federal government’s central planning ambitions and trash our free market system; and would have big government picking winners and losers just as Obama‘s administration has done with the Solyndra swindle and plundering of our federal treasury?
Tell us Mark Levin, what part of Federalist No. 45 do you not understand which summarizes our federal government’s constitutionally limited job as follows?
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.
Tell us Mark Levin, what part of the Tenth Amendment which was specifically adopted to give force and effect to Federalist No. 45 and guarantee “federalism“, our Constitution’s plan, do you not understand, when you dare to call Herman Cain a “conservative“?
JWK
Read my lips Herman Cain. No additional national sales tax on top of the socialist tax calculated from incomes which you support.
I am no Cain diehard but as a rule I like Levin a lot.
not on board with his Civil War views but aside from that one could do worse
JWK
Read my lips Herman Cain. No additional national sales tax on top of the socialist tax calculated from incomes which you support
I know we have our sob’s, but they’re OUR sob’s and the RINO drive-by trolls can take it elsewhere.
Are these crybabies all we have left?
Just like with Sarah..any critique and like schoolgirls you run to Jim to kneel and clamour for the bolt like you're knitters and this is a tribunal for the guillotine
it's silly, grow up and refute those you disagree with and quit asking for JR to give you an easy out
so far I don't see Fresno zotting the anti Cain crowd..so good luck./..guess that could change
but mark my words...like Lord of the Flies
once you gals and guys ban everyone who has the gall to poke at you then you will cannibalize one another like some of you did when you left here for Wideawakes a few years back
I miss the Free Republic of 10 years ago
(for disclosure...I was a Palin supporter..but unlike what mindreaders here insisted she opted out...I am not a Cain supporter in the primaries but I like Levin)
Oh, please... Read the responses on the thread if you want to understand why I said that.
Funny thing is, I too like Mark! Especially when he exposes pinkos who long for government picking winners and losers, so long as their man is in the White House!
JWK
I don’t even know what you said.
JWK
I’m really amazed that you and your garbage vanities have not yet been zotted.
By the way, on your last ridiculous vanity, you complained that I did not address all ten of your “objections.”
Thereafter, I painstakingly did.
I never heard a word in response to my analysis.
Anyone that listens to Levin know both he and Cain are no RINOs. You must be one of those Perry supporters....
What upset because Levin called your candidate out for trying to smear Cain?
JWK
You don't know the meaning of IBTZ? I thought you'd been around here for awhile.
It stands for In Before The Zot.
JWK
Read my lips Herman Cain. No additional national sales tax on top of the socialist tax calculated from incomes which you support.
You are not alone.
Hey John...
9,9,9 cannot go into law unless the current Communist Progressive tax code that you are defending is reapealed. I love how you like to pretend that is not the case in order to attack Cain’s tax plan.
I’ll tell you what too.. Cain’s plan is heck of a lot better than the current 80,000 pages tax code that YOU are defending.
One more thing. Why is it that NO OTHER CANDIDATE TALKED ABOUT REAL TAX REFORM? It’s because CAIN IS A LEADER and not scared like the rest of the candidates. Now I see many of them like Perry and Romney are now coming up with their own tax plans.
If Herman Cain were sincere about wanting to unleash America’s free market system and allowing it to do its magic, the first thing Herman would propose is to end the “progressive‘s” occupation of the united States which began in 1913 with 16th Amendment, and he would propose to end this occupation with the following words:
The Sixteenth Amendment is hereby repealed and Congress is henceforth forbidden to lay ``any`` tax or burden calculated from profits, gains, interest, salaries, wages, tips, inheritances or any other lawfully realized money, which would return us to our Constitution’s ORIGINAL TAX PLAN as our founders intended it to operate, and paved the way for America to become the economic marvel of the world, when it was adhered to!
JWK
If Mark is a RINO then I’m a card carrying member of the Communist Party and I assure you that is as far from the truth as one can get.
I have a news flash for you; all taxes are imposed by governments. Whether local, state or federal there’s a government involved. The 999 plan by it’s nature is no more or less a product of a government. The benefit and the conservative element is that it reduces the portion from our income and allows us to reduce the taxes we pay by reducing, as best we can, what we spend. I’d that clear enough?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.